Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: passLast probed: 2026-10-04 · 1 day ago

blockrun.ai/api/v1/pm/markets/search

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://blockrun.ai/api/v1/pm/markets/search
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodGET
Networkeip155:8453
Receiving address0x6e007731870ede419cfb31889cd5c4493cecb04c
Declared price (base units)8500
Catalog statusactive
First seen / last seen2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-10-03 01:04 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)35 / 7

2.Probe history

2026-08-142026-10-04
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 30 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-10-04 22:40 UTCGETpass402193 ms—
2026-10-04 04:40 UTCGETpass402227 ms—
2026-10-03 13:40 UTCGETpass402153 ms—
2026-10-02 13:40 UTCGETpass402297 ms—
2026-10-01 16:40 UTCGETpass402114 ms—
2026-09-30 22:40 UTCGETpass402258 ms—
2026-09-30 04:40 UTCGETpass402319 ms—
2026-09-29 13:40 UTCGETpass402360 ms—
2026-09-28 16:40 UTCGETpass402361 ms—
2026-09-27 22:40 UTCGETpass402201 ms—
2026-09-27 04:40 UTCGETpass402286 ms—
2026-09-26 13:40 UTCGETpass402486 ms—
2026-09-25 16:40 UTCGETpass402204 ms—
2026-09-24 22:40 UTCGETpass40262 ms—
2026-09-24 04:40 UTCGETpass402141 ms—
2026-09-23 13:40 UTCGETpass402260 ms—
2026-09-22 16:40 UTCGETpass40295 ms—
2026-09-21 22:40 UTCGETpass402203 ms—
2026-09-21 04:40 UTCGETpass402410 ms—
2026-09-20 13:40 UTCGETpass402171 ms—
2026-09-19 22:40 UTCGETpass402261 ms—
2026-09-19 04:40 UTCGETpass402332 ms—
2026-09-18 13:40 UTCGETpass402366 ms—
2026-09-17 16:40 UTCGETpass402289 ms—
2026-09-17 04:40 UTCGETpass402218 ms—
2026-09-14 11:24 UTCGETpass40282 ms—
2026-09-11 11:24 UTCGETpass402221 ms—
2026-09-07 11:24 UTCGETpass402114 ms—
2026-09-02 11:24 UTCGETpass402213 ms—
2026-08-14 08:52 UTCGETfail40266 msaccepts_invalid402 without a payable accept in the header or the body (which part was missing was not recorded before the 2026-09-29 change).

3.L1 — real purchases

0 of 3 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 0 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.

3 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (0 settled and answered 4xx, 3 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).

Terms in this table

settle_failed
vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
unsettled_4xx
held_reason in the export: the paid request got a 4xx with no settlement receipt and no transaction.
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
0/3
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled on-chain, crossed = signed, and not settled on-chain.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPOn-chain txLatency
09-29 15:31settle_failed422—4192 ms
8500 units (≈ $0.0085 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: no charge
09-23 12:01settle_failed422—798 ms
8500 units (≈ $0.0085 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: no charge
09-17 06:00settle_failed422—874 ms
8500 units (≈ $0.0085 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: no charge

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

No listing changes observed.

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.

20–2,000 characters · 0 so far