Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: withdrawnLast probed: 2026-09-11 · 43 days ago

agent.gexlog.com/agent/historical

Withdrawn from the catalog. This route is absent from a complete fetch of the public discovery catalog, so it is left out of the public L0 fail count.

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://agent.gexlog.com/agent/historical
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodGET
Catalog networkeip155:8453
Receiving address0xa980cc5c3c8031badb6d3434908311effdfa4d7e
Declared price (base units)10000
Catalog statusdelisted (since 2026-09-12 01:03 UTC)
First seen / last seen2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-09-11 01:03 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)7 / 5

2.Probe history

2026-08-192026-09-11
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 21 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-09-11 22:40 UTCGETfail400201 msno_402HTTP 400 instead of 402 to an unpaid GET.
2026-09-11 13:40 UTCGETfail400116 msno_402HTTP 400 instead of 402 to an unpaid GET.
2026-09-10 23:40 UTCGETpass402218 ms—
2026-09-10 05:40 UTCGETpass402370 ms—
2026-09-09 17:40 UTCGETpass402145 ms—
2026-09-09 05:40 UTCGETpass402209 ms—
2026-09-08 17:40 UTCGETpass402316 ms—
2026-09-08 05:40 UTCGETpass402161 ms—
2026-09-07 14:40 UTCGETpass4022278 ms—
2026-09-06 23:40 UTCGETpass4021970 ms—
2026-09-06 14:40 UTCGETpass402542 ms—
2026-09-05 23:40 UTCGETpass4022159 ms—
2026-09-05 14:40 UTCGETpass402403 ms—
2026-09-04 23:40 UTCGETpass402500 ms—
2026-09-04 14:40 UTCGETpass402142 ms—
2026-09-03 23:40 UTCGETpass4022090 ms—
2026-09-03 14:40 UTCGETpass402311 ms—
2026-09-02 23:40 UTCGETpass402318 ms—
2026-09-02 14:40 UTCGETpass402348 ms—
2026-09-02 05:40 UTCGETpass402178 ms—
2026-08-19 10:56 UTCGETfail402146 msaccepts_invalid402 without a payable accept in the header or the body (which part was missing was not recorded before the 2026-09-29 change).

3.L1 — real purchases

2 of 2 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 2 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read matched the one-time value stored for that purchase, so the transaction is the one for this purchase. Stellar is not in this count. The Stellar re-read checks payer, payee, amount and asset. A row reads as amount + payee when the re-read matched payer, payee, amount and asset and did not bind a one-time value. That tier holds rows from before 2026-09-04 and Stellar rows. They keep the settled label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer vet402 confirmed on-chain. delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered. definitions.

A row marked tx from our index came back with no settlement receipt from the seller. Our own index of on-chain settlements found the transfer afterwards — our payer, this endpoint's payee, the exact amount, inside the time window — and the row goes through the same on-chain re-read as any other before it reads settled. The seller did not name that transaction; we did (methodology).

Terms in this table

settled (nonce-bound)
vet402 re-read the transfer on-chain in that chain's pinned settlement asset, and the on-chain re-read matched the one-time value stored for that purchase, so the transaction is the one for this purchase. Stellar is not in this count.
settled (amount + payee)
vet402 re-read the transfer on-chain in that chain's pinned settlement asset: the on-chain re-read matched payer, payee, amount and asset and did not bind a one-time value (rows before 2026-09-04, and Stellar).
L2 no_declaration
the listing's output schema gave vet402 nothing to check this response against (no schema, a schema with no required keys and no example properties, or example properties with a content type that is not JSON). An output example the seller puts in the 402 (extensions.bazaar.info.output.example) is not checked yet.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “attribution under review”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
2/2
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled on-chain, crossed = signed, and not settled on-chain.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPOn-chain txPayment chainLatency
09-11 01:00settled (nonce-bound)tx from our index2000xbe80830b…4234Base1902 ms
10000 units (≈ $0.01 USDC) · L2 no_declarationWhose side: no failure (delivered)
09-02 12:08settled (amount + payee)tx from our index2000x9e0782f4…7bc6Base1167 ms
10000 units (≈ $0.01 USDC) · L2 no_declarationWhose side: no failure (delivered)

Embed this record

Run this endpoint? Show the settle-through record vet402 measured — the badge reads 2/2 settled · 2 delivered and updates as the record grows. It carries the host it is about and the date it was last measured, so a saved copy cannot pass itself off as current. It states a measurement, not a rating.

vet402: 2 of 2 paid attempts settled with an on-chain receipt, and 2 of those also returned a 2xx response. settled is the confirmed transfer; delivered is the response arriving. A measurement of what happened when vet402 paid this endpoint, not a recommendation. (agent.gexlog.com · measured 2026-09-11)

[![vet402 receipt](https://vet402.com/api/badge/endpoint/09427d5e-3c8e-4a74-bc38-14410e6c0f71.svg)](https://vet402.com/observatory/e/09427d5e-3c8e-4a74-bc38-14410e6c0f71)

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

Catalog listing events, newest first
Detected onEventBeforeAfter
2026-09-12delisted{"status":"active"}{"status":"delisted"}

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

A dispute does not start a purchase. The signed dispute route runs one fresh L0 check, an unpaid request.

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight. If it was right, it stands. This listing is not active in the catalog, so a dispute filed on the record form does not put it on the re-probe list. The record stays on this page. The scheduled L0 run is at 10:30 UTC. This listing is not on that run. Send the dispute to support@vet402.com. Published corrections are listed at /corrections. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference). That route runs one fresh L0 check under the normal publication gate. A later purchase comes from the regular schedule.

20–2,000 characters · 0 so far