api.loyalspark.online/x402-gateway/merchant-profile
1.Catalog declaration
| Resource URL | https://api.loyalspark.online/x402-gateway/merchant-profile |
| Source | cdp_bazaar |
| Declared method | POST |
| Network | eip155:8453 |
| Receiving address | 0x40a8cdd6a10ec1a8cb3dfb2834675e7a2cf4ad8b |
| Declared price (base units) | 5000 |
| Catalog status | active |
| First seen / last seen | 2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-09-30 01:03 UTC |
| Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d) | 112 / 18 |
2.Probe history
| Probed at | Method | Verdict | HTTP | Latency | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-29 16:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 173 ms | — |
| 2026-09-28 22:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 2199 ms | — |
| 2026-09-28 04:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 441 ms | — |
| 2026-09-27 13:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 306 ms | — |
| 2026-09-26 16:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 356 ms | — |
| 2026-09-26 04:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 318 ms | — |
| 2026-09-25 13:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 242 ms | — |
| 2026-09-24 16:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 237 ms | — |
| 2026-09-23 22:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 121 ms | — |
| 2026-09-23 04:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 129 ms | — |
| 2026-09-22 13:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 174 ms | — |
| 2026-09-21 16:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 221 ms | — |
| 2026-09-20 22:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 171 ms | — |
| 2026-09-20 04:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 292 ms | — |
| 2026-09-19 13:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 106 ms | — |
| 2026-09-18 16:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 155 ms | — |
| 2026-09-18 04:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 264 ms | — |
| 2026-09-17 13:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 264 ms | — |
| 2026-09-16 16:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 176 ms | — |
| 2026-09-15 22:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 269 ms | — |
| 2026-09-15 04:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 180 ms | — |
| 2026-09-14 16:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 253 ms | — |
| 2026-09-13 22:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 631 ms | — |
| 2026-09-13 13:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 290 ms | — |
| 2026-09-12 16:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 138 ms | — |
| 2026-09-12 04:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 2374 ms | — |
| 2026-09-11 13:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 135 ms | — |
| 2026-09-10 23:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 159 ms | — |
| 2026-09-10 14:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 230 ms | — |
| 2026-09-09 23:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 183 ms | — |
3.L1 — real purchases
3 of 3 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 0 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.
A row marked tx from our index came back with no settlement receipt from the seller. Our own index of on-chain settlements found the transfer afterwards — our payer, this endpoint's payee, the exact amount, inside the time window — and the row goes through the same on-chain re-read as any other before it reads settled. The seller did not name that transaction; we did (methodology).
3 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (3 settled and answered 4xx, 0 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).
Terms in this table
settled (nonce-bound)- vet402 confirmed the USDC transfer on-chain, and the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time nonce vet402 signed for that purchase.
settled_4xx- held_reason in the export: the payment settled, then the paid request got a 4xx.
L2 not_checked- not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Whose side- the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
| Attempted at | Result | HTTP | On-chain tx | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09-17 12:522026-09-17 12:52 UTC | settled (nonce-bound)tx from our index | 401 | 0xb59591ad…ae68 | 1945 ms |
| 5000 units (≈ $0.005 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted (held) | ||||
| 09-11 12:082026-09-11 12:08 UTC | settled (nonce-bound)tx from our index | 401 | 0x84278408…fe20 | 2343 ms |
| 5000 units (≈ $0.005 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted (held) | ||||
| 09-05 07:002026-09-05 07:00 UTC | settled (nonce-bound)tx from our index | 401 | 0xf8385085…c3be | 1658 ms |
| 5000 units (≈ $0.005 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted (held) | ||||
Embed this record
Run this endpoint? Show the settle-through record vet402 measured — the badge reads 3/3 settled · 0 delivered · 3 inconclusive and updates as the record grows. It carries the host it is about and the date it was last measured, so a saved copy cannot pass itself off as current. It states a measurement, not a rating.
[](https://vet402.com/observatory/e/16e428fc-33b0-4af9-90bf-2564e3011439)4.Catalog listing events
No listing changes observed.
unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.
5.Dispute this record
Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.