Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: passLast probed: 2026-09-29 · 1 day ago

api.loyalspark.online/x402-gateway/analytics

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://api.loyalspark.online/x402-gateway/analytics
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodGET
Networkeip155:8453
Receiving address0x40a8cdd6a10ec1a8cb3dfb2834675e7a2cf4ad8b
Declared price (base units)5000
Catalog statusactive
First seen / last seen2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-09-30 01:03 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)66 / 13

2.Probe history

2026-09-092026-09-29
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 30 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-09-29 22:40 UTCGETpass402229 ms—
2026-09-29 04:40 UTCGETpass402306 ms—
2026-09-28 13:40 UTCGETpass402550 ms—
2026-09-27 16:40 UTCGETpass402535 ms—
2026-09-26 22:40 UTCGETpass402150 ms—
2026-09-26 13:40 UTCGETpass402633 ms—
2026-09-25 16:40 UTCGETpass402187 ms—
2026-09-24 22:40 UTCGETpass402261 ms—
2026-09-24 04:40 UTCGETpass402122 ms—
2026-09-23 13:40 UTCGETpass402480 ms—
2026-09-22 16:40 UTCGETpass402191 ms—
2026-09-21 22:40 UTCGETpass402400 ms—
2026-09-21 04:40 UTCGETpass402249 ms—
2026-09-20 13:40 UTCGETpass402373 ms—
2026-09-19 16:40 UTCGETpass402227 ms—
2026-09-18 22:40 UTCGETpass402260 ms—
2026-09-18 13:40 UTCGETpass402386 ms—
2026-09-17 16:40 UTCGETpass402395 ms—
2026-09-16 22:40 UTCGETpass402131 ms—
2026-09-16 13:40 UTCGETpass402362 ms—
2026-09-15 13:40 UTCGETpass4021646 ms—
2026-09-14 16:40 UTCGETpass402157 ms—
2026-09-14 04:40 UTCGETpass402137 ms—
2026-09-13 13:40 UTCGETpass402236 ms—
2026-09-12 22:40 UTCGETpass402193 ms—
2026-09-12 13:40 UTCGETpass402297 ms—
2026-09-11 16:40 UTCGETpass402232 ms—
2026-09-11 04:40 UTCGETpass402172 ms—
2026-09-10 17:40 UTCGETpass402123 ms—
2026-09-09 23:40 UTCGETpass402259 ms—

3.L1 — real purchases

3 of 3 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 0 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.

A row marked tx from our index came back with no settlement receipt from the seller. Our own index of on-chain settlements found the transfer afterwards — our payer, this endpoint's payee, the exact amount, inside the time window — and the row goes through the same on-chain re-read as any other before it reads settled. The seller did not name that transaction; we did (methodology).

3 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (3 settled and answered 4xx, 0 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).

Terms in this table

settled (nonce-bound)
vet402 confirmed the USDC transfer on-chain, and the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time nonce vet402 signed for that purchase.
settled (amount + payee)
vet402 confirmed the USDC transfer on-chain; the on-chain re-read matched amount, payee, asset and chain; no nonce was on record (rows before 2026-09-04).
settled_4xx
held_reason in the export: the payment settled, then the paid request got a 4xx.
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
3/3
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled on-chain, crossed = signed, and not settled on-chain.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPOn-chain txLatency
09-16 12:09settled (nonce-bound)tx from our index4010x1d55f892…0edf1935 ms
5000 units (≈ $0.005 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted (held)
09-10 01:00settled (nonce-bound)tx from our index4010xd9946235…4fd11812 ms
5000 units (≈ $0.005 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted (held)
09-03 12:07settled (amount + payee)tx from our index4010xa0ecee8f…e0e62430 ms
5000 units (≈ $0.005 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted (held)

Embed this record

Run this endpoint? Show the settle-through record vet402 measured — the badge reads 3/3 settled · 0 delivered · 3 inconclusive and updates as the record grows. It carries the host it is about and the date it was last measured, so a saved copy cannot pass itself off as current. It states a measurement, not a rating.

vet402: 3 of 3 paid attempts settled with an on-chain receipt, and 0 of those also returned a 2xx response. settled is the confirmed transfer; delivered is the response arriving. 3 paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against the seller: a paid request that answered 4xx, settled or not, can be our own request being malformed, because vet402 buys with no API key and sends a request body only when the seller declares one; and a 402 or 5xx from 2026-09-13 to 2026-09-15 came while vet402's own payer wallet was out of USDC. A measurement of what happened when vet402 paid this endpoint, not a recommendation. (api.loyalspark.online · measured 2026-09-16)

[![vet402 receipt](https://vet402.com/api/badge/endpoint/1eda2832-48d6-49e5-a2fe-29adddaa2b4b.svg)](https://vet402.com/observatory/e/1eda2832-48d6-49e5-a2fe-29adddaa2b4b)

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

No listing changes observed.

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.

20–2,000 characters · 0 so far

api.loyalspark.online/x402-gateway/analytics — x402 purchase and probe record | vet402