Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: passLast probed: 2026-11-02 · 1 day ago

api.anchor-x402.com/v1/anchor

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://api.anchor-x402.com/v1/anchor
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodPOST
Catalog networkeip155:8453
Receiving address0x127462e296fac1a7f5cf33ba57bb2f0fff5cd0b6
Declared price (base units)5000
Catalog statusactive
First seen / last seen2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-11-03 16:05 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)4 / 3

2.Probe history

2026-09-212026-11-02
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 30 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-11-02 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402233 ms—
2026-10-31 04:40 UTCPOSTpass4022252 ms—
2026-10-29 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402274 ms—
2026-10-27 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402302 ms—
2026-10-25 15:40 UTCPOSTpass402327 ms—
2026-10-23 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402315 ms—
2026-10-21 22:40 UTCPOSTpass4022192 ms—
2026-10-20 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402347 ms—
2026-10-18 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402242 ms—
2026-10-17 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402258 ms—
2026-10-16 12:40 UTCPOSTpass402341 ms—
2026-10-14 21:40 UTCPOSTpass402531 ms—
2026-10-13 15:40 UTCPOSTpass402351 ms—
2026-10-12 12:40 UTCPOSTpass402284 ms—
2026-10-11 03:40 UTCPOSTpass402328 ms—
2026-10-10 03:40 UTCPOSTpass402511 ms—
2026-10-08 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402265 ms—
2026-10-07 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402278 ms—
2026-10-06 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402232 ms—
2026-10-06 04:41 UTCPOSTpass402343 ms—
2026-09-27 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402537 ms—
2026-09-27 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402342 ms—
2026-09-26 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402272 ms—
2026-09-25 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402368 ms—
2026-09-24 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402222 ms—
2026-09-24 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402582 ms—
2026-09-23 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402159 ms—
2026-09-22 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402397 ms—
2026-09-21 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402153 ms—
2026-09-21 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402189 ms—

3.L1 — real purchases

0 of 3 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 0 of those also returned a deliverable 2xx response (delivered: other than 202 Accepted with a non-empty body). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read matched the one-time value stored for that purchase, so the transaction is the one for this purchase. Stellar is not in this count. The Stellar re-read checks payer, payee, amount and asset. A row reads as amount + payee when the re-read matched payer, payee, amount and asset and did not bind a one-time value. That tier holds rows from before 2026-09-04 and Stellar rows. They keep the settled label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer vet402 confirmed on-chain. delivered is a 2xx other than 202 with a non-empty body. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered. definitions.

3 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (0 settled and answered 4xx, 3 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).

3 of the paid attempts failed on vet402's side (for example our wallet was out of USDC, or we did not send the input the listing declares). The rows stay in the table.

Terms in this table

settle_failed
vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
unsettled_4xx
held_reason in the export: the paid request got a 4xx with no settlement receipt and no transaction.
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “attribution under review”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
0/3
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled on-chain, crossed = signed, and not settled on-chain.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPOn-chain txPayment chainLatency
08-30 12:09settle_failed422—Base420 ms
5000 units (≈ $0.005 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: vet402's side
08-23 12:43settle_failed422—Base355 ms
5000 units (≈ $0.005 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: vet402's side
08-14 10:08settle_failed422—Base275 ms
5000 units (≈ $0.005 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: vet402's side

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

Catalog listing events, newest first
Detected onEventBeforeAfter
2026-10-06relisted{"status":"delisted"}{"status":"active"}
2026-09-28delisted{"status":"active"}{"status":"delisted"}

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

A dispute does not start a purchase. The signed dispute route runs one fresh L0 check, an unpaid request.

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight. If it was right, it stands. A dispute filed on the record form puts an active listing on a priority list. L0 runs probe that list before their ordinary queue, one run at a time. A listing whose URL has an unfilled path parameter is not put on that list. One run measures up to 50 priority listings, at most 5 from one site. Published fails whose catalog declaration changed, or that rest on probes recorded under earlier rules, take places first, and disputes fill the places left. A listing probed in the past 60 minutes waits for a later run. A dispute that no run reaches within 7 days leaves the list. The scheduled L0 run is at 10:30 UTC, and an L0 run at another time can measure the listing first. The record stays on this page. When a run measures the listing, the new probe is added to its history. Send the dispute to support@vet402.com. Published corrections are listed at /corrections. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference). That route runs one fresh L0 check under the normal publication gate. A later purchase comes from the regular schedule.

20–2,000 characters · 0 so far