Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: withdrawnLast probed: 2026-10-10 · 14 days ago

api.clinkforge.com/v1/p/kev-status-by-cve

Withdrawn from the catalog. This route is absent from a complete fetch of the public discovery catalog, so it is left out of the public L0 fail count.

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://api.clinkforge.com/v1/p/kev-status-by-cve
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodGET
Catalog networkeip155:8453
Receiving address0xf3d62244749ea344aa5408e7bc50b5287f2b32cc
Declared price (base units)1000
Catalog statusdelisted (since 2026-10-10 13:03 UTC)
First seen / last seen2026-08-31 01:03 UTC / 2026-10-09 13:03 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)2 / 2

2.Probe history

2026-09-162026-10-10
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 30 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-10-10 12:40 UTCGETfail530385 msno_402HTTP 530 instead of 402 to an unpaid GET.
2026-10-09 12:40 UTCGETfail530671 msno_402HTTP 530 instead of 402 to an unpaid GET.
2026-10-08 04:40 UTCGETpass402133 ms—
2026-10-07 04:40 UTCGETpass402346 ms—
2026-10-06 04:41 UTCGETpass402201 ms—
2026-10-04 22:40 UTCGETpass402139 ms—
2026-10-03 22:40 UTCGETpass402186 ms—
2026-10-03 04:40 UTCGETpass402113 ms—
2026-10-02 13:40 UTCGETpass402177 ms—
2026-10-01 16:40 UTCGETpass402546 ms—
2026-09-30 16:40 UTCGETpass402261 ms—
2026-09-29 22:40 UTCGETpass402179 ms—
2026-09-29 04:40 UTCGETpass402233 ms—
2026-09-28 13:40 UTCGETpass402102 ms—
2026-09-27 22:40 UTCGETpass402537 ms—
2026-09-27 04:40 UTCGETpass402176 ms—
2026-09-26 13:40 UTCGETpass402230 ms—
2026-09-25 16:40 UTCGETpass402334 ms—
2026-09-24 22:40 UTCGETpass402138 ms—
2026-09-24 04:40 UTCGETpass402279 ms—
2026-09-23 13:40 UTCGETpass402371 ms—
2026-09-22 16:40 UTCGETpass402303 ms—
2026-09-21 22:40 UTCGETpass402598 ms—
2026-09-21 04:40 UTCGETpass402209 ms—
2026-09-20 13:40 UTCGETpass402253 ms—
2026-09-19 16:40 UTCGETpass4022085 ms—
2026-09-19 04:40 UTCGETpass402304 ms—
2026-09-18 13:40 UTCGETpass402321 ms—
2026-09-17 16:40 UTCGETpass402154 ms—
2026-09-16 22:40 UTCGETpass402132 ms—

3.L1 — real purchases

0 of 3 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 0 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read matched the one-time value stored for that purchase, so the transaction is the one for this purchase. Stellar is not in this count. The Stellar re-read checks payer, payee, amount and asset. A row reads as amount + payee when the re-read matched payer, payee, amount and asset and did not bind a one-time value. That tier holds rows from before 2026-09-04 and Stellar rows. They keep the settled label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer vet402 confirmed on-chain. delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered. definitions.

2 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (0 settled and answered 4xx, 2 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).

2 of the paid attempts failed on vet402's side (for example our wallet was out of USDC, or we did not send the input the listing declares). The rows stay in the table.

Terms in this table

settle_failed
vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
unsettled_4xx
held_reason in the export: the paid request got a 4xx with no settlement receipt and no transaction.
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “attribution under review”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
0/3
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled on-chain, crossed = signed, and not settled on-chain.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPOn-chain txPayment chainLatency
09-27 06:02settle_failed (withdrawn from the catalog)422—Base1174 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: vet402's sideLeft out of the public L0 fail count.
09-15 23:51settle_failed (withdrawn from the catalog)502—Base372 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: vet402 unprovenLeft out of the public L0 fail count.
09-07 07:00settle_failed (withdrawn from the catalog)422—Base875 ms
5000 units (≈ $0.005 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: vet402's sideLeft out of the public L0 fail count.

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

Catalog listing events, newest first
Detected onEventBeforeAfter
2026-10-10delisted{"status":"active"}{"status":"delisted"}
2026-10-06relisted{"status":"delisted"}{"status":"active"}
2026-10-06delisted{"status":"active"}{"status":"delisted"}

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

A dispute does not start a purchase. The signed dispute route runs one fresh L0 check, an unpaid request.

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight. If it was right, it stands. This listing is not active in the catalog, so a dispute filed on the record form does not put it on the re-probe list. The record stays on this page. The scheduled L0 run is at 10:30 UTC. This listing is not on that run. Send the dispute to support@vet402.com. Published corrections are listed at /corrections. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference). That route runs one fresh L0 check under the normal publication gate. A later purchase comes from the regular schedule.

20–2,000 characters · 0 so far