Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: passLast probed: 2026-09-29 · today

mcp-snowy-dew-9447.fly.dev/verify

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://mcp-snowy-dew-9447.fly.dev/verify
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodPOST
Networkeip155:8453
Receiving address0xdec42c75e539bf3b9ba0340236e1b9c367312e4a
Declared price (base units)3000
Catalog statusactive
First seen / last seen2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-09-29 01:03 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)2 / 2

2.Probe history

2026-09-092026-09-29
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 30 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-09-29 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402375 ms—
2026-09-28 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402221 ms—
2026-09-27 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402195 ms—
2026-09-26 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402143 ms—
2026-09-26 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402284 ms—
2026-09-25 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402427 ms—
2026-09-24 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402235 ms—
2026-09-23 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402237 ms—
2026-09-23 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402160 ms—
2026-09-22 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402111 ms—
2026-09-21 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402300 ms—
2026-09-21 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402176 ms—
2026-09-20 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402134 ms—
2026-09-19 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402293 ms—
2026-09-18 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402226 ms—
2026-09-18 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402110 ms—
2026-09-17 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402205 ms—
2026-09-16 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402262 ms—
2026-09-15 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402218 ms—
2026-09-15 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402172 ms—
2026-09-14 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402213 ms—
2026-09-14 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402114 ms—
2026-09-13 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402259 ms—
2026-09-12 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402240 ms—
2026-09-12 04:40 UTCPOSTpass4022201 ms—
2026-09-11 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402216 ms—
2026-09-11 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402159 ms—
2026-09-10 14:40 UTCPOSTpass402118 ms—
2026-09-09 23:40 UTCPOSTpass402350 ms—
2026-09-09 14:40 UTCPOSTpass402114 ms—

3.L1 — real purchases

1 of 2 paid attempts settled with a receipt, and 1 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash — the receipt is the evidence. A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.

1 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (0 settled and answered 4xx, 1 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).

1 of the paid attempts failed on vet402's side (for example our wallet was out of USDC, or we did not send the input the listing declares). The rows stay in the table; the embeddable badge below leaves them out of its count and names them as “vet402 side”.

Terms in this table

settled (nonce-bound)
vet402 confirmed the USDC transfer on-chain, and the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time nonce vet402 signed for that purchase.
settle_failed
vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
unsettled_4xx
held_reason in the export: the paid request got a 4xx with no settlement receipt and no transaction.
L2 no_declaration
the listing declares no output schema to check the response against.
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
1/2
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled with an on-chain receipt, crossed = paid but no receipt.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPReceipt (tx)Latency
09-28 12:02settled (nonce-bound)2000x66f72cc3…d9e92067 ms
3000 units (≈ $0.003 USDC) · L2 no_declarationWhose side: no failure (delivered)
09-04 07:02settle_failed400—603 ms
3000 units (≈ $0.003 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: vet402's side

Embed this record

Run this endpoint? Show the settle-through record vet402 measured — the badge reads 1/1 settled · 1 delivered · vet402 side 1 and updates as the record grows. It carries the host it is about and the date it was last measured, so a saved copy cannot pass itself off as current. It states a measurement, not a rating.

vet402: 1 of 1 paid attempts settled with an on-chain receipt, and 1 of those also returned a 2xx response. settled is the confirmed transfer; delivered is the response arriving. 1 further paid attempt failed on vet402's side (for example its wallet was out of USDC, or it did not send the input the listing declares) and is left out of these counts. A measurement of what happened when vet402 paid this endpoint, not a recommendation. (mcp-snowy-dew-9447.fly.dev · measured 2026-09-28)

[![vet402 receipt](https://vet402.com/api/badge/endpoint/363bc3e9-304a-42df-b6ab-62cc932700cc.svg)](https://vet402.com/observatory/e/363bc3e9-304a-42df-b6ab-62cc932700cc)

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

No listing changes observed.

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.

About the purchase at 2026-09-04T07:02:07Z (UTC). The form starts with that time; add what you saw instead.