Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: unverifiedLast probed: 2026-10-02 · 43 days ago

agentpaystore.com/agentic-arena/at-bat/api/entry

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://agentpaystore.com/agentic-arena/at-bat/api/entry
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodPOST
Catalog networkeip155:8453
Receiving address0x367f1b3d8ca90d1e087481a9a40d585bf3451a03
Declared price (base units)500000
Catalog statusdelisted (since 2026-10-03 01:04 UTC)
First seen / last seen2026-09-25 01:02 UTC / 2026-10-02 01:04 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)1 / 1

2.Probe history

2026-09-252026-10-02
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 10 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-10-02 22:40 UTCPOSTfail405120 msno_402HTTP 405 instead of 402 to an unpaid POST.
2026-10-01 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402154 ms—
2026-10-01 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402256 ms—
2026-09-30 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402514 ms—
2026-09-29 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402619 ms—
2026-09-28 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402647 ms—
2026-09-28 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402778 ms—
2026-09-27 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402652 ms—
2026-09-26 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402182 ms—
2026-09-25 10:30 UTCPOSTpass40253 ms—

3.L1 — real purchases

1 of 1 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 0 of those also returned a deliverable 2xx response (delivered: other than 202 Accepted with a non-empty body). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read matched the one-time value stored for that purchase, so the transaction is the one for this purchase. Stellar is not in this count. The Stellar re-read checks payer, payee, amount and asset. A row reads as amount + payee when the re-read matched payer, payee, amount and asset and did not bind a one-time value. That tier holds rows from before 2026-09-04 and Stellar rows. They keep the settled label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer vet402 confirmed on-chain. delivered is a 2xx other than 202 with a non-empty body. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered. definitions.

A row marked tx from our index came back with no settlement receipt from the seller. Our own index of on-chain settlements found the transfer afterwards — our payer, this endpoint's payee, the exact amount, inside the time window — and the row goes through the same on-chain re-read as any other before it reads settled. The seller did not name that transaction; we did (methodology).

1 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (1 settled and answered 4xx, 0 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).

Terms in this table

settled (nonce-bound)
vet402 re-read the transfer on-chain in that chain's pinned settlement asset, and the on-chain re-read matched the one-time value stored for that purchase, so the transaction is the one for this purchase. Stellar is not in this count.
settled_4xx
held_reason in the export: the payment settled, then the paid request got a 4xx.
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Stage inconclusive
vet402 holds the row because the paid HTTP response was 4xx, or vet402's payer wallet was unfunded in a recorded window. vet402 keeps the row public in its own stage, apart from delivered and not_delivered.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “attribution under review”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
1/1
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled on-chain, crossed = signed, and not settled on-chain.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPOn-chain txPayment chainLatency
09-27 00:00settled (nonce-bound)tx from our index4000x27ba415d…3e18Base1516 ms
500000 units (≈ $0.50 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted (held)Stage: inconclusive

Embed this record

Run this endpoint? Show the settle-through record vet402 measured — the badge reads 1/1 settled · 0 delivered · 1 inconclusive and updates as the record grows. It carries the host it is about and the date it was last measured, so a saved copy cannot pass itself off as current. It states a measurement, not a rating.

vet402: 1 of 1 paid attempts settled with an on-chain receipt, and 0 of those also returned a deliverable HTTP 2xx response. settled is the confirmed transfer; delivered is a 2xx other than 202 with a non-empty body. 1 paid attempt is held as inconclusive rather than counted against the seller: a paid request that answered 4xx, settled or not, can be our own request being malformed, because vet402 buys with no API key and sends a request body only when the seller declares one; and a 402 or 5xx from 2026-09-13 to 2026-09-15 came while vet402's own payer wallet was out of USDC. A measurement of what happened when vet402 paid this endpoint, not a recommendation. (agentpaystore.com · measured 2026-09-27)

[![vet402 receipt](https://vet402.com/api/badge/endpoint/3c45fecf-17a2-4355-bbef-e28f2a9e4d0d.svg)](https://vet402.com/observatory/e/3c45fecf-17a2-4355-bbef-e28f2a9e4d0d)

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

Catalog listing events, newest first
Detected onEventBeforeAfter
2026-10-03delisted{"status":"active"}{"status":"delisted"}

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

A dispute does not start a purchase. The signed dispute route runs one fresh L0 check, an unpaid request.

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight. If it was right, it stands. This listing is not active in the catalog, so a dispute filed on the record form does not put it on the re-probe list. The record stays on this page. The scheduled L0 run is at 10:30 UTC. This listing is not on that run. Send the dispute to support@vet402.com. Published corrections are listed at /corrections. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference). That route runs one fresh L0 check under the normal publication gate. A later purchase comes from the regular schedule.

20–2,000 characters · 0 so far