Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: withdrawnLast probed: 2026-09-22 · 32 days ago

api.runx.ai/v1/skills/ausca/browser-session/run

Withdrawn from the catalog. This route is absent from a complete fetch of the public discovery catalog, so it is left out of the public L0 fail count.

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://api.runx.ai/v1/skills/ausca/browser-session/run
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodPOST
Catalog networkeip155:8453
Receiving address0x26572ff23c6c52bfb1a69cb0c9114a8be443b422
Declared price (base units)50000
Catalog statusdelisted (since 2026-09-23 01:02 UTC)
First seen / last seen2026-09-02 01:03 UTC / 2026-09-22 01:03 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)5 / 1

2.Probe history

2026-09-052026-09-22
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 12 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-09-22 22:40 UTCPOSTfail401384 msno_402HTTP 401 instead of 402 to an unpaid POST.
2026-09-22 04:40 UTCPOSTfail401270 msno_402HTTP 401 instead of 402 to an unpaid POST.
2026-09-21 13:40 UTCPOSTfail4012198 msno_402HTTP 401 instead of 402 to an unpaid POST.
2026-09-20 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402893 ms—
2026-09-20 04:40 UTCPOSTpass4022487 ms—
2026-09-19 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402547 ms—
2026-09-18 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402480 ms—
2026-09-17 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402719 ms—
2026-09-17 11:24 UTCPOSTfail—10001 mstimeoutNo response headers arrived within 10 seconds.
2026-09-13 11:24 UTCPOSTpass4026265 ms—
2026-09-09 11:24 UTCPOSTpass402525 ms—
2026-09-05 11:24 UTCPOSTpass402423 ms—

3.L1 — real purchases

0 of 1 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 0 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read matched the one-time value stored for that purchase, so the transaction is the one for this purchase. Stellar is not in this count. The Stellar re-read checks payer, payee, amount and asset. A row reads as amount + payee when the re-read matched payer, payee, amount and asset and did not bind a one-time value. That tier holds rows from before 2026-09-04 and Stellar rows. They keep the settled label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer vet402 confirmed on-chain. delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered. definitions.

1 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (0 settled and answered 4xx, 1 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).

Terms in this table

settle_failed
vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
unsettled_4xx
held_reason in the export: the paid request got a 4xx with no settlement receipt and no transaction.
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “attribution under review”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
0/1
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled on-chain, crossed = signed, and not settled on-chain.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPOn-chain txPayment chainLatency
09-18 12:08settle_failed (withdrawn from the catalog)401—Base461 ms
50000 units (≈ $0.05 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: no chargeLeft out of the public L0 fail count.

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

Catalog listing events, newest first
Detected onEventBeforeAfter
2026-09-23delisted{"status":"active"}{"status":"delisted"}

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

A dispute does not start a purchase. The signed dispute route runs one fresh L0 check, an unpaid request.

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight. If it was right, it stands. This listing is not active in the catalog, so a dispute filed on the record form does not put it on the re-probe list. The record stays on this page. The scheduled L0 run is at 10:30 UTC. This listing is not on that run. Send the dispute to support@vet402.com. Published corrections are listed at /corrections. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference). That route runs one fresh L0 check under the normal publication gate. A later purchase comes from the regular schedule.

20–2,000 characters · 0 so far