Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: passLast probed: 2026-09-29 · 1 day ago

md.fastdb.in/pulse/odds

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://md.fastdb.in/pulse/odds
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodPOST
Networkeip155:8453
Receiving address0x072f3a2bd93bb75b1eb84a9e45d17a4f90a6d801
Declared price (base units)1000
Catalog statusactive
First seen / last seen2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-09-30 01:03 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)9 / 5

2.Probe history

2026-09-092026-09-29
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 30 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-09-29 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402381 ms—
2026-09-29 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402492 ms—
2026-09-28 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402437 ms—
2026-09-27 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402437 ms—
2026-09-26 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402469 ms—
2026-09-26 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402428 ms—
2026-09-25 13:40 UTCPOSTpass4022213 ms—
2026-09-24 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402364 ms—
2026-09-24 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402938 ms—
2026-09-23 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402464 ms—
2026-09-22 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402342 ms—
2026-09-21 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402499 ms—
2026-09-21 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402464 ms—
2026-09-20 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402461 ms—
2026-09-19 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402380 ms—
2026-09-18 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402434 ms—
2026-09-18 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402540 ms—
2026-09-17 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402439 ms—
2026-09-16 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402378 ms—
2026-09-15 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402382 ms—
2026-09-15 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402428 ms—
2026-09-14 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402379 ms—
2026-09-14 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402376 ms—
2026-09-13 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402369 ms—
2026-09-12 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402390 ms—
2026-09-12 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402374 ms—
2026-09-11 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402391 ms—
2026-09-11 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402462 ms—
2026-09-10 14:40 UTCPOSTpass402361 ms—
2026-09-09 23:40 UTCPOSTpass402593 ms—

3.L1 — real purchases

2 of 5 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 2 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.

2 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (0 settled and answered 4xx, 2 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).

2 of the paid attempts failed on vet402's side (for example our wallet was out of USDC, or we did not send the input the listing declares). The rows stay in the table; the embeddable badge below leaves them out of its count and names them as “vet402 side”.

Terms in this table

settle_claimed
the seller returned a receipt that vet402 has not re-read on-chain yet.
settled (nonce-bound)
vet402 confirmed the USDC transfer on-chain, and the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time nonce vet402 signed for that purchase.
settle_failed
vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
unsettled_4xx
held_reason in the export: the paid request got a 4xx with no settlement receipt and no transaction.
L2 no_declaration
the listing declares no output schema to check the response against.
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
2/5
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled on-chain, crossed = signed, and not settled on-chain.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPOn-chain txLatency
09-30 09:32settle_claimed2000xe8295f5b…fd822296 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 no_declarationWhose side: not sorted: awaiting on-chain verification
09-24 06:01settled (nonce-bound)2000xf51dbbf4…aebb2352 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 no_declarationWhose side: no failure (delivered)
09-17 12:53settled (nonce-bound)2000x70f34eba…c5fb1798 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 no_declarationWhose side: no failure (delivered)
09-11 12:09settle_failed400—882 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: vet402's side
09-02 19:02settle_failed400—761 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: vet402's side

Embed this record

Run this endpoint? Show the settle-through record vet402 measured — the badge reads 2/3 settled · 2 delivered · vet402 side 2 and updates as the record grows. It carries the host it is about and the date it was last measured, so a saved copy cannot pass itself off as current. It states a measurement, not a rating.

vet402: 2 of 3 paid attempts settled with an on-chain receipt, and 2 of those also returned a 2xx response. settled is the confirmed transfer; delivered is the response arriving. 2 further paid attempts failed on vet402's side (for example its wallet was out of USDC, or it did not send the input the listing declares) and are left out of these counts. A measurement of what happened when vet402 paid this endpoint, not a recommendation. (md.fastdb.in · measured 2026-09-30)

[![vet402 receipt](https://vet402.com/api/badge/endpoint/50da9842-f7dc-4113-bb40-eb5ffc698692.svg)](https://vet402.com/observatory/e/50da9842-f7dc-4113-bb40-eb5ffc698692)

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

No listing changes observed.

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.

20–2,000 characters · 0 so far