Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: passLast probed: 2026-11-12 · today

api.deepentresearch.com/v1/agent/chat

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://api.deepentresearch.com/v1/agent/chat
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodPOST
Catalog networkeip155:8453
Receiving address0x4d4405566355d43416aee248d9fb5abd3b0f636d
Declared price (base units)50000
Catalog statusactive
First seen / last seen2026-10-02 01:04 UTC / 2026-11-12 16:05 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)3 / 2

2.Probe history

2026-10-022026-11-12
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 29 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-11-12 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402753 ms—
2026-11-09 22:40 UTCPOSTpass4022252 ms—
2026-11-07 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402304 ms—
2026-11-05 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402447 ms—
2026-11-02 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402419 ms—
2026-10-31 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402287 ms—
2026-10-29 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402217 ms—
2026-10-27 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402268 ms—
2026-10-25 18:40 UTCPOSTpass402316 ms—
2026-10-23 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402267 ms—
2026-10-22 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402505 ms—
2026-10-20 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402231 ms—
2026-10-19 13:40 UTCPOSTfail402368 msmetadata_mismatchDeclared payTo 0xaf4e…c2e8 on eip155:8453; the 402 offered 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453, 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453.
2026-10-17 16:40 UTCPOSTfail402223 msmetadata_mismatchDeclared payTo 0xaf4e…c2e8 on eip155:8453; the 402 offered 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453, 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453.
2026-10-16 12:40 UTCPOSTfail402392 msmetadata_mismatchDeclared payTo 0xaf4e…c2e8 on eip155:8453; the 402 offered 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453, 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453.
2026-10-14 21:40 UTCPOSTfail402639 msmetadata_mismatchDeclared payTo 0xaf4e…c2e8 on eip155:8453; the 402 offered 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453, 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453.
2026-10-13 15:40 UTCPOSTfail4021052 msmetadata_mismatchDeclared payTo 0xaf4e…c2e8 on eip155:8453; the 402 offered 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453, 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453.
2026-10-12 12:40 UTCPOSTfail402439 msmetadata_mismatchDeclared payTo 0xaf4e…c2e8 on eip155:8453; the 402 offered 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453, 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453.
2026-10-11 12:40 UTCPOSTfail402493 msmetadata_mismatchDeclared payTo 0xaf4e…c2e8 on eip155:8453; the 402 offered 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453, 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453.
2026-10-10 12:40 UTCPOSTfail402546 msmetadata_mismatchDeclared payTo 0xaf4e…c2e8 on eip155:8453; the 402 offered 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453, 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453.
2026-10-09 12:40 UTCPOSTfail402490 msmetadata_mismatchDeclared payTo 0xaf4e…c2e8 on eip155:8453; the 402 offered 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453, 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453.
2026-10-07 22:40 UTCPOSTfail402600 msmetadata_mismatchDeclared payTo 0xaf4e…c2e8 on eip155:8453; the 402 offered 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453, 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453.
2026-10-07 04:40 UTCPOSTfail402331 msmetadata_mismatchDeclared payTo 0xaf4e…c2e8 on eip155:8453; the 402 offered 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453, 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453.
2026-10-06 04:41 UTCPOSTfail402473 msmetadata_mismatchDeclared payTo 0xaf4e…c2e8 on eip155:8453; the 402 offered 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453, 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453.
2026-10-04 16:40 UTCPOSTfail402439 msmetadata_mismatchDeclared payTo 0xaf4e…c2e8 on eip155:8453; the 402 offered 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453, 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453.
2026-10-03 22:40 UTCPOSTfail402681 msmetadata_mismatchDeclared payTo 0xaf4e…c2e8 on eip155:8453; the 402 offered 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453, 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453.
2026-10-03 04:40 UTCPOSTfail402553 msmetadata_mismatchDeclared payTo 0xaf4e…c2e8 on eip155:8453; the 402 offered 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453, 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453.
2026-10-02 10:30 UTCPOSTfail402494 msmetadata_mismatchDeclared payTo 0xaf4e…c2e8 on eip155:8453; the 402 offered 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453, 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453.
2026-10-02 04:40 UTCPOSTfail402327 msmetadata_mismatchDeclared payTo 0xaf4e…c2e8 on eip155:8453; the 402 offered 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453, 0x4d44…636D on eip155:8453.

3.L1 — real purchases

1 of 1 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 0 of those also returned a deliverable 2xx response (delivered: other than 202 Accepted with a non-empty body). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read matched the one-time value stored for that purchase, so the transaction is the one for this purchase. Stellar is not in this count. The Stellar re-read checks payer, payee, amount and asset. A row reads as amount + payee when the re-read matched payer, payee, amount and asset and did not bind a one-time value. That tier holds rows from before 2026-09-04 and Stellar rows. They keep the settled label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer vet402 confirmed on-chain. delivered is a 2xx other than 202 with a non-empty body. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered. definitions.

A row marked tx from our index came back with no settlement receipt from the seller. Our own index of on-chain settlements found the transfer afterwards — our payer, this endpoint's payee, the exact amount, inside the time window — and the row goes through the same on-chain re-read as any other before it reads settled. The seller did not name that transaction; we did (methodology).

Terms in this table

settled (nonce-bound)
vet402 re-read the transfer on-chain in that chain's pinned settlement asset, and the on-chain re-read matched the one-time value stored for that purchase, so the transaction is the one for this purchase. Stellar is not in this count.
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “attribution under review”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
1/1
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled on-chain, crossed = signed, and not settled on-chain.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPOn-chain txPayment chainLatency
10-20 18:02settled (nonce-bound)tx from our index—0x36046bf5…f647Base20325 ms
50000 units (≈ $0.05 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: vet402 stopped waiting

Embed this record

Run this endpoint? Show the settle-through record vet402 measured — the badge reads 1/1 settled · 0 delivered and updates as the record grows. It carries the host it is about and the date it was last measured, so a saved copy cannot pass itself off as current. It states a measurement, not a rating.

vet402: 1 of 1 paid attempts settled with an on-chain receipt, and 0 of those also returned a deliverable HTTP 2xx response. settled is the confirmed transfer; delivered is a 2xx other than 202 with a non-empty body. A measurement of what happened when vet402 paid this endpoint, not a recommendation. (api.deepentresearch.com · measured 2026-10-20)

[![vet402 receipt](https://vet402.com/api/badge/endpoint/6bd6d57c-2bf4-48ad-ab31-39ac1b6208cb.svg)](https://vet402.com/observatory/e/6bd6d57c-2bf4-48ad-ab31-39ac1b6208cb)

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

No listing changes observed.

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

A dispute does not start a purchase. The signed dispute route runs one fresh L0 check, an unpaid request.

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight. If it was right, it stands. A dispute filed on the record form puts an active listing on a priority list. L0 runs probe that list before their ordinary queue, one run at a time. A listing whose URL has an unfilled path parameter is not put on that list. One run measures up to 50 priority listings, at most 5 from one site. Published fails whose catalog declaration changed, or that rest on probes recorded under earlier rules, take places first, and disputes fill the places left. A listing probed in the past 60 minutes waits for a later run. A dispute that no run reaches within 7 days leaves the list. The scheduled L0 run is at 10:30 UTC, and an L0 run at another time can measure the listing first. The record stays on this page. When a run measures the listing, the new probe is added to its history. Send the dispute to support@vet402.com. Published corrections are listed at /corrections. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference). That route runs one fresh L0 check under the normal publication gate. A later purchase comes from the regular schedule.

About the purchase at 2026-10-20T18:02:35Z (UTC). The form starts with that time; add what you saw instead.

20–2,000 characters · 59 so far