agentworld.me/api/ccn/live-feed/paid
1.Catalog declaration
| Resource URL | https://agentworld.me/api/ccn/live-feed/paid |
| Source | cdp_bazaar |
| Declared method | GET |
| Network | eip155:8453 |
| Receiving address | 0x367f1b3d8ca90d1e087481a9a40d585bf3451a03 |
| Declared price (base units) | 1000 |
| Catalog status | active |
| First seen / last seen | 2026-08-14 08:52 UTC / 2026-09-29 01:03 UTC |
| Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d) | 2 / 1 |
2.Probe history
| Probed at | Method | Verdict | HTTP | Latency | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-28 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 372 ms | — |
| 2026-09-27 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 523 ms | — |
| 2026-09-27 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 941 ms | — |
| 2026-09-26 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 508 ms | — |
| 2026-09-25 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 480 ms | — |
| 2026-09-25 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 532 ms | — |
| 2026-09-19 22:40 UTC | GET | fail | — | 10001 ms | timeoutNo response headers arrived within 10 seconds. |
| 2026-09-19 04:40 UTC | GET | fail | — | 9999 ms | timeoutNo response headers arrived within 10 seconds. |
| 2026-09-18 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 341 ms | — |
| 2026-09-17 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 343 ms | — |
| 2026-09-17 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 303 ms | — |
| 2026-09-16 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 652 ms | — |
| 2026-09-15 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 301 ms | — |
| 2026-09-14 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 2265 ms | — |
| 2026-09-14 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 403 ms | — |
| 2026-09-13 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 272 ms | — |
| 2026-09-13 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 259 ms | — |
| 2026-09-12 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 2006 ms | — |
| 2026-09-11 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 293 ms | — |
| 2026-09-11 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 279 ms | — |
| 2026-09-10 17:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 252 ms | — |
| 2026-09-10 05:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 344 ms | — |
| 2026-09-09 17:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 251 ms | — |
| 2026-09-09 05:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 274 ms | — |
| 2026-09-08 14:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 310 ms | — |
| 2026-09-07 23:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 252 ms | — |
| 2026-09-07 14:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 284 ms | — |
| 2026-09-06 23:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 215 ms | — |
| 2026-09-06 14:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 280 ms | — |
| 2026-09-05 23:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 94 ms | — |
3.L1 — real purchases
1 of 1 paid attempts settled with a receipt, and 0 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash — the receipt is the evidence. A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.
A row marked tx from our index came back with no settlement receipt from the seller. Our own index of on-chain settlements found the transfer afterwards — our payer, this endpoint's payee, the exact amount, inside the time window — and the row goes through the same on-chain re-read as any other before it reads settled. The seller did not name that transaction; we did (methodology).
1 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (1 settled and answered 4xx, 0 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).
Terms in this table
settled (nonce-bound)- vet402 confirmed the USDC transfer on-chain, and the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time nonce vet402 signed for that purchase.
settled_4xx- held_reason in the export: the payment settled, then the paid request got a 4xx.
L2 not_checked- not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Whose side- the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
| Attempted at | Result | HTTP | Receipt (tx) | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09-06 07:012026-09-06 07:01 UTC | settled (nonce-bound)tx from our index | 402 | 0x315b34a4…3c8b | 1997 ms |
| 1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted (held) | ||||
Embed this record
Run this endpoint? Show the settle-through record vet402 measured — the badge reads 1/1 settled · 0 delivered · 1 inconclusive and updates as the record grows. It carries the host it is about and the date it was last measured, so a saved copy cannot pass itself off as current. It states a measurement, not a rating.
[](https://vet402.com/observatory/e/6d520f52-b6cf-4bbf-bcbc-61a469469629)4.Catalog listing events
| Detected on | Event | Before | After |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-25 | relisted | {"status":"delisted"} | {"status":"active"} |
| 2026-09-20 | delisted | {"status":"active"} | {"status":"delisted"} |
| 2026-08-30 | relisted | {"status":"delisted"} | {"status":"active"} |
| 2026-08-21 | delisted | {"status":"active"} | {"status":"delisted"} |
unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.
5.Dispute this record
Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.
About the purchase at 2026-09-06T07:01:35Z (UTC). The form starts with that time; add what you saw instead.