Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: passLast probed: 2026-10-05 · today

stableenrich.dev/api/google-maps/place-details/partial

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://stableenrich.dev/api/google-maps/place-details/partial
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodGET
Networkeip155:8453
Receiving address0x325bdf6f7efab24a2210c48c1b64cab2eae1d430
Declared price (base units)20000
Catalog statusactive
First seen / last seen2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-10-03 01:04 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)45 / 6

2.Probe history

2026-09-132026-10-05
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 30 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-10-05 04:40 UTCGETpass402289 ms—
2026-10-04 13:40 UTCGETpass402573 ms—
2026-10-03 16:40 UTCGETpass402675 ms—
2026-10-02 22:40 UTCGETpass402288 ms—
2026-10-01 22:40 UTCGETpass40274 ms—
2026-10-01 04:40 UTCGETpass402204 ms—
2026-09-30 13:40 UTCGETpass402136 ms—
2026-09-29 16:40 UTCGETpass402204 ms—
2026-09-28 22:40 UTCGETpass402104 ms—
2026-09-28 04:40 UTCGETpass402142 ms—
2026-09-27 13:40 UTCGETpass402176 ms—
2026-09-26 16:40 UTCGETpass4021965 ms—
2026-09-25 22:40 UTCGETpass40283 ms—
2026-09-25 04:40 UTCGETpass4022215 ms—
2026-09-24 13:40 UTCGETpass402197 ms—
2026-09-23 22:40 UTCGETpass402756 ms—
2026-09-23 04:40 UTCGETpass402380 ms—
2026-09-22 13:40 UTCGETpass402290 ms—
2026-09-21 16:40 UTCGETpass402188 ms—
2026-09-20 22:40 UTCGETpass402391 ms—
2026-09-20 04:40 UTCGETpass4021044 ms—
2026-09-19 13:40 UTCGETpass4021111 ms—
2026-09-18 16:40 UTCGETpass402318 ms—
2026-09-17 22:40 UTCGETpass402141 ms—
2026-09-17 13:40 UTCGETpass402252 ms—
2026-09-16 16:40 UTCGETpass402640 ms—
2026-09-15 16:40 UTCGETpass40295 ms—
2026-09-15 04:40 UTCGETpass402212 ms—
2026-09-14 13:40 UTCGETpass402438 ms—
2026-09-13 22:40 UTCGETpass402882 ms—

3.L1 — real purchases

0 of 3 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 0 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.

3 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (0 settled and answered 4xx, 3 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).

3 of the paid attempts failed on vet402's side (for example our wallet was out of USDC, or we did not send the input the listing declares). The rows stay in the table.

Terms in this table

settle_failed
vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
unsettled_4xx
held_reason in the export: the paid request got a 4xx with no settlement receipt and no transaction.
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
0/3
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled on-chain, crossed = signed, and not settled on-chain.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPOn-chain txLatency
09-10 01:00settle_failed400—331 ms
20000 units (≈ $0.02 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: vet402's side
09-08 19:00settle_failed400—323 ms
20000 units (≈ $0.02 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: vet402's side
09-03 07:00settle_failed400—146 ms
20000 units (≈ $0.02 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: vet402's side

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

No listing changes observed.

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.

20–2,000 characters · 0 so far

stableenrich.dev/api/google-maps/place-details/partial — x402 purchase and probe record | vet402