bykaranteli.com/api/x402/funding-history
1.Catalog declaration
| Resource URL | https://bykaranteli.com/api/x402/funding-history |
| Source | cdp_bazaar |
| Declared method | GET |
| Network | eip155:8453 |
| Receiving address | 0xb4c6c903dee310e4060d8e6eb68582426be1baa9 |
| Declared price (base units) | 100000 |
| Catalog status | active |
| First seen / last seen | 2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-10-03 01:04 UTC |
| Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d) | 3 / 2 |
2.Probe history
| Probed at | Method | Verdict | HTTP | Latency | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-04 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 327 ms | — |
| 2026-10-04 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 136 ms | — |
| 2026-10-03 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 287 ms | — |
| 2026-10-02 13:40 UTC | GET | fail | 402 | 120 ms | price_mismatchDeclared 5000 of 0x8335…2913; the 402 offered 100000 of 0x8335…2913, 100000 of EPjFWd…Dt1v. |
| 2026-10-01 16:40 UTC | GET | fail | 402 | 159 ms | price_mismatchDeclared 5000 of 0x8335…2913; the 402 offered 100000 of 0x8335…2913, 100000 of EPjFWd…Dt1v. |
| 2026-09-30 22:40 UTC | GET | fail | 402 | 110 ms | price_mismatchDeclared 5000 of 0x8335…2913; the 402 offered 100000 of 0x8335…2913, 100000 of EPjFWd…Dt1v. |
| 2026-09-30 04:40 UTC | GET | fail | 402 | 477 ms | price_mismatchDeclared 5000 of 0x8335…2913; the 402 offered 100000 of 0x8335…2913, 100000 of EPjFWd…Dt1v. |
| 2026-09-29 10:30 UTC | GET | fail | 402 | 158 ms | price_mismatchDeclared 5000 of 0x8335…2913; the 402 offered 100000 of 0x8335…2913, 100000 of EPjFWd…Dt1v. |
| 2026-09-29 07:38 UTC | GET | fail | 402 | 256 ms | price_mismatchDeclared 5000 of 0x8335…2913; the 402 offered 100000 of 0x8335…2913, 100000 of EPjFWd…Dt1v. |
| 2026-09-28 22:40 UTC | GET | fail | 402 | 2344 ms | price_mismatchAmount or asset differs from the catalog declaration (the values compared were not recorded before the 2026-09-29 change). |
| 2026-09-28 04:40 UTC | GET | fail | 402 | 442 ms | price_mismatchAmount or asset differs from the catalog declaration (the values compared were not recorded before the 2026-09-29 change). |
| 2026-09-27 13:40 UTC | GET | fail | 402 | 492 ms | price_mismatchAmount or asset differs from the catalog declaration (the values compared were not recorded before the 2026-09-29 change). |
| 2026-09-26 16:40 UTC | GET | fail | 402 | 389 ms | price_mismatchAmount or asset differs from the catalog declaration (the values compared were not recorded before the 2026-09-29 change). |
| 2026-09-26 04:40 UTC | GET | fail | 402 | 380 ms | price_mismatchAmount or asset differs from the catalog declaration (the values compared were not recorded before the 2026-09-29 change). |
| 2026-09-25 13:40 UTC | GET | fail | 402 | 752 ms | price_mismatchAmount or asset differs from the catalog declaration (the values compared were not recorded before the 2026-09-29 change). |
| 2026-09-24 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 298 ms | — |
| 2026-09-23 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 441 ms | — |
| 2026-09-23 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 700 ms | — |
| 2026-09-22 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 415 ms | — |
| 2026-09-21 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 307 ms | — |
| 2026-09-20 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 226 ms | — |
| 2026-09-20 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 504 ms | — |
| 2026-09-19 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 163 ms | — |
| 2026-09-18 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 160 ms | — |
| 2026-09-18 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 311 ms | — |
| 2026-09-17 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 214 ms | — |
| 2026-09-16 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 360 ms | — |
| 2026-09-15 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 497 ms | — |
| 2026-09-15 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 412 ms | — |
| 2026-09-14 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 222 ms | — |
3.L1 — real purchases
1 of 1 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 1 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.
Terms in this table
settled (nonce-bound)- vet402 confirmed the USDC transfer on-chain, and the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time nonce vet402 signed for that purchase.
L2 mismatch- the response lacked fields the listing's output schema declares.
Whose side- the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
| Attempted at | Result | HTTP | On-chain tx | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09-10 19:002026-09-10 19:00 UTC | settled (nonce-bound) | 200 | 0xd212490c…b45d | 3776 ms |
| 5000 units (≈ $0.005 USDC) · L2 mismatchWhose side: no failure (delivered) | ||||
Embed this record
Run this endpoint? Show the settle-through record vet402 measured — the badge reads 1/1 settled · 1 delivered and updates as the record grows. It carries the host it is about and the date it was last measured, so a saved copy cannot pass itself off as current. It states a measurement, not a rating.
[](https://vet402.com/observatory/e/8582662b-4897-47e9-b8aa-9733f2791bde)4.Catalog listing events
| Detected on | Event | Before | After |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-02 | relisted | {"status":"delisted"} | {"status":"active"} |
| 2026-08-18 | delisted | {"status":"active"} | {"status":"delisted"} |
unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.
5.Dispute this record
Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.