conc-exe.xyz/api/concierge-security-headers
1.Catalog declaration
| Resource URL | https://conc-exe.xyz/api/concierge-security-headers |
| Source | cdp_bazaar |
| Declared method | POST |
| Network | eip155:8453 |
| Receiving address | 0xb85c83cc448edca8eb724f5d79b523faff9375a7 |
| Declared price (base units) | 20000 |
| Catalog status | active |
| First seen / last seen | 2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-10-01 01:03 UTC |
| Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d) | 3 / 2 |
2.Probe history
| Probed at | Method | Verdict | HTTP | Latency | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-30 22:40 UTC | POST | fail | 402 | 97 ms | accepts_invalid402 without a payable accept: no PAYMENT-REQUIRED header; body has no accepts array. |
| 2026-09-30 04:40 UTC | POST | fail | 402 | 226 ms | accepts_invalid402 without a payable accept: no PAYMENT-REQUIRED header; body has no accepts array. |
| 2026-09-29 13:40 UTC | POST | fail | 402 | 208 ms | accepts_invalid402 without a payable accept: no PAYMENT-REQUIRED header; body has no accepts array. |
| 2026-09-28 16:40 UTC | POST | fail | 402 | 224 ms | accepts_invalid402 without a payable accept in the header or the body (which part was missing was not recorded before the 2026-09-29 change). |
| 2026-09-27 22:40 UTC | POST | fail | 402 | 300 ms | accepts_invalid402 without a payable accept in the header or the body (which part was missing was not recorded before the 2026-09-29 change). |
| 2026-09-27 04:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 854 ms | — |
| 2026-09-26 13:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 310 ms | — |
| 2026-09-25 16:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 212 ms | — |
| 2026-09-25 04:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 471 ms | — |
| 2026-09-24 13:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 515 ms | — |
| 2026-09-23 16:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 426 ms | — |
| 2026-09-22 22:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 302 ms | — |
| 2026-09-22 04:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 2070 ms | — |
| 2026-09-21 13:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 509 ms | — |
| 2026-09-20 16:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 636 ms | — |
| 2026-09-19 22:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 305 ms | — |
| 2026-09-19 04:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 64 ms | — |
| 2026-09-18 13:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 459 ms | — |
| 2026-09-17 22:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 262 ms | — |
| 2026-09-17 04:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 267 ms | — |
| 2026-09-16 13:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 223 ms | — |
| 2026-09-15 16:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 248 ms | — |
| 2026-09-14 22:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 225 ms | — |
| 2026-09-14 13:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 243 ms | — |
| 2026-09-13 16:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 225 ms | — |
| 2026-09-13 04:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 573 ms | — |
| 2026-09-12 13:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 306 ms | — |
| 2026-09-11 22:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 241 ms | — |
| 2026-09-11 11:24 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 42 ms | — |
| 2026-09-07 11:24 UTC | POST | fail | 402 | 19 ms | accepts_invalid402 without a payable accept in the header or the body (which part was missing was not recorded before the 2026-09-29 change). |
3.L1 — real purchases
1 of 1 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 0 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.
A row marked tx from our index came back with no settlement receipt from the seller. Our own index of on-chain settlements found the transfer afterwards — our payer, this endpoint's payee, the exact amount, inside the time window — and the row goes through the same on-chain re-read as any other before it reads settled. The seller did not name that transaction; we did (methodology).
1 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (1 settled and answered 4xx, 0 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).
Terms in this table
settled (nonce-bound)- vet402 confirmed the USDC transfer on-chain, and the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time nonce vet402 signed for that purchase.
settled_4xx- held_reason in the export: the payment settled, then the paid request got a 4xx.
L2 not_checked- not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Whose side- the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
| Attempted at | Result | HTTP | On-chain tx | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09-11 18:002026-09-11 18:00 UTC | settled (nonce-bound)tx from our index | 400 | 0x490c0cf1…3ba0 | 1625 ms |
| 20000 units (≈ $0.02 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: charged, then rejected an input vet402 had not sent | ||||
Embed this record
Run this endpoint? Show the settle-through record vet402 measured — the badge reads 1/1 settled · 0 delivered · 1 inconclusive and updates as the record grows. It carries the host it is about and the date it was last measured, so a saved copy cannot pass itself off as current. It states a measurement, not a rating.
[](https://vet402.com/observatory/e/886abfd5-8554-4c76-95a4-0023b786da07)4.Catalog listing events
No listing changes observed.
unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.
5.Dispute this record
Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.