www.qrbase.xyz/api/x402/ping

Withdrawn from the catalog. This route is absent from a complete fetch of the public discovery catalog, so it is left out of the public L0 fail count.

1.Catalog declaration

→ 0 more columns

2.Probe history

→ 0 more columns

3.L1 — real purchases

2 of 3 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 2 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read matched the one-time value stored for that purchase, so the transaction is the one for this purchase. Stellar is not in this count. The Stellar re-read checks payer, payee, amount and asset. A row reads as amount + payee when the re-read matched payer, payee, amount and asset and did not bind a one-time value. That tier holds rows from before 2026-09-04 and Stellar rows. They keep the settled label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer vet402 confirmed on-chain. delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered. definitions.

A row marked tx from our index came back with no settlement receipt from the seller. Our own index of on-chain settlements found the transfer afterwards — our payer, this endpoint's payee, the exact amount, inside the time window — and the row goes through the same on-chain re-read as any other before it reads settled. The seller did not name that transaction; we did (methodology).

1 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (0 settled and answered 4xx, 0 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 1 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).

1 of the paid attempts failed on vet402's side (for example our wallet was out of USDC, or we did not send the input the listing declares). The rows stay in the table; the embeddable badge below leaves them out of its count and names them as “vet402 side”.

→ 0 more columns

[![vet402 receipt](https://vet402.com/api/badge/endpoint/89170a46-b5f4-4822-834e-bec1fa07d788.svg)](https://vet402.com/observatory/e/89170a46-b5f4-4822-834e-bec1fa07d788)

4.Catalog listing events

→ 0 more columns

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

A dispute does not start a purchase. The signed dispute route runs one fresh L0 check, an unpaid request.

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight. If it was right, it stands. This listing is not active in the catalog, so a dispute filed on the record form does not put it on the re-probe list. The record stays on this page. The scheduled L0 run is at 10:30 UTC. This listing is not on that run. Send the dispute to support@vet402.com. Published corrections are listed at /corrections. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference). That route runs one fresh L0 check under the normal publication gate. A later purchase comes from the regular schedule.