Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: passLast probed: 2026-09-30 · today

app.heinrichstech.com/v1/cdp/echo

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://app.heinrichstech.com/v1/cdp/echo
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodPOST
Networkeip155:8453
Receiving address0xda2f35d283c42dd60b965322394bc658a5c1769f
Declared price (base units)1000
Catalog statusactive
First seen / last seen2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-09-30 01:03 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)20 / 16

2.Probe history

2026-09-102026-09-30
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 30 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-09-30 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402219 ms—
2026-09-29 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402132 ms—
2026-09-28 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402163 ms—
2026-09-27 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402112 ms—
2026-09-27 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402917 ms—
2026-09-26 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402169 ms—
2026-09-25 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402726 ms—
2026-09-25 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402120 ms—
2026-09-24 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402222 ms—
2026-09-23 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402203 ms—
2026-09-22 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402293 ms—
2026-09-22 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402184 ms—
2026-09-21 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402192 ms—
2026-09-20 16:40 UTCPOSTpass4022262 ms—
2026-09-19 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402136 ms—
2026-09-19 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402220 ms—
2026-09-18 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402210 ms—
2026-09-17 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402131 ms—
2026-09-17 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402104 ms—
2026-09-16 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402416 ms—
2026-09-15 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402647 ms—
2026-09-14 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402506 ms—
2026-09-14 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402159 ms—
2026-09-13 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402150 ms—
2026-09-13 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402109 ms—
2026-09-12 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402104 ms—
2026-09-11 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402135 ms—
2026-09-11 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402231 ms—
2026-09-10 23:40 UTCPOSTpass402359 ms—
2026-09-10 05:40 UTCPOSTpass402200 ms—

3.L1 — real purchases

2 of 5 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 2 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.

3 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (0 settled and answered 4xx, 2 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 1 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).

1 of the paid attempts failed on vet402's side (for example our wallet was out of USDC, or we did not send the input the listing declares). The rows stay in the table; the embeddable badge below leaves them out of its count and names them as “vet402 side”.

Terms in this table

settle_failed
vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
settled (nonce-bound)
vet402 confirmed the USDC transfer on-chain, and the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time nonce vet402 signed for that purchase.
settled (amount + payee)
vet402 confirmed the USDC transfer on-chain; the on-chain re-read matched amount, payee, asset and chain; no nonce was on record (rows before 2026-09-04).
unsettled_4xx
held_reason in the export: the paid request got a 4xx with no settlement receipt and no transaction.
payer_unfunded
held_reason in the export: a 402 or 5xx while vet402's Base wallet was out of USDC (2026-09-13 to 2026-09-15).
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
L2 no_declaration
the listing declares no output schema to check the response against.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
2/5
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled on-chain, crossed = signed, and not settled on-chain.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPOn-chain txLatency
09-29 15:31settle_failed400—377 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: no charge
09-21 18:00settle_failed400—694 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: no charge
09-15 12:07settle_failed502—511 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: vet402's side
09-09 07:01settled (nonce-bound)2020x751f9043…27f94285 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: paid, no result in the answer
09-02 07:00settled (amount + payee)2000x837605a6…505e1403 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 no_declarationWhose side: no failure (delivered)

Embed this record

Run this endpoint? Show the settle-through record vet402 measured — the badge reads 2/4 settled · 2 delivered · 2 inconclusive · vet402 side 1 and updates as the record grows. It carries the host it is about and the date it was last measured, so a saved copy cannot pass itself off as current. It states a measurement, not a rating.

vet402: 2 of 4 paid attempts settled with an on-chain receipt, and 2 of those also returned a 2xx response. settled is the confirmed transfer; delivered is the response arriving. 2 paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against the seller: a paid request that answered 4xx, settled or not, can be our own request being malformed, because vet402 buys with no API key and sends a request body only when the seller declares one; and a 402 or 5xx from 2026-09-13 to 2026-09-15 came while vet402's own payer wallet was out of USDC. 1 further paid attempt failed on vet402's side (for example its wallet was out of USDC, or it did not send the input the listing declares) and is left out of these counts. A measurement of what happened when vet402 paid this endpoint, not a recommendation. (app.heinrichstech.com · measured 2026-09-29)

[![vet402 receipt](https://vet402.com/api/badge/endpoint/8aa69172-db01-46b1-b3fc-ccd2cf9c8138.svg)](https://vet402.com/observatory/e/8aa69172-db01-46b1-b3fc-ccd2cf9c8138)

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

No listing changes observed.

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.

20–2,000 characters · 0 so far