Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: passLast probed: 2026-09-30 · today

api.slamai.dev/chain/tokens/trending

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://api.slamai.dev/chain/tokens/trending
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodGET
Networkbase
Receiving address0xd85096faec1ac03075667b4c1a1661f5623bf111
Declared price (base units)—
Catalog statusactive
First seen / last seen2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-09-30 01:03 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)5 / 4

2.Probe history

2026-09-102026-09-30
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 30 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-09-30 04:40 UTCGETpass402346 ms—
2026-09-29 13:40 UTCGETpass402304 ms—
2026-09-28 16:40 UTCGETpass402567 ms—
2026-09-27 22:40 UTCGETpass402496 ms—
2026-09-27 13:40 UTCGETpass40296 ms—
2026-09-26 16:40 UTCGETpass402451 ms—
2026-09-25 22:40 UTCGETpass402391 ms—
2026-09-25 04:40 UTCGETpass402448 ms—
2026-09-24 13:40 UTCGETpass402362 ms—
2026-09-23 16:40 UTCGETpass402470 ms—
2026-09-22 22:40 UTCGETpass402940 ms—
2026-09-22 04:40 UTCGETpass402266 ms—
2026-09-21 13:40 UTCGETpass40272 ms—
2026-09-20 16:40 UTCGETpass402768 ms—
2026-09-19 22:40 UTCGETpass402477 ms—
2026-09-19 04:40 UTCGETpass402251 ms—
2026-09-18 16:40 UTCGETpass402524 ms—
2026-09-17 22:40 UTCGETpass402433 ms—
2026-09-17 04:40 UTCGETpass402347 ms—
2026-09-16 13:40 UTCGETpass402409 ms—
2026-09-15 16:40 UTCGETpass402330 ms—
2026-09-14 22:40 UTCGETpass402235 ms—
2026-09-14 13:40 UTCGETpass402582 ms—
2026-09-13 16:40 UTCGETpass402334 ms—
2026-09-13 04:40 UTCGETpass402494 ms—
2026-09-12 13:40 UTCGETpass402356 ms—
2026-09-11 22:40 UTCGETpass402272 ms—
2026-09-11 13:40 UTCGETpass402318 ms—
2026-09-10 17:40 UTCGETpass402352 ms—
2026-09-10 05:40 UTCGETpass402294 ms—

3.L1 — real purchases

3 of 5 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 1 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.

A row marked tx from our index came back with no settlement receipt from the seller. Our own index of on-chain settlements found the transfer afterwards — our payer, this endpoint's payee, the exact amount, inside the time window — and the row goes through the same on-chain re-read as any other before it reads settled. The seller did not name that transaction; we did (methodology).

Terms in this table

settled (nonce-bound)
vet402 confirmed the USDC transfer on-chain, and the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time nonce vet402 signed for that purchase.
settled (amount + payee)
vet402 confirmed the USDC transfer on-chain; the on-chain re-read matched amount, payee, asset and chain; no nonce was on record (rows before 2026-09-04).
settle_failed
vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
L2 no_declaration
the listing declares no output schema to check the response against.
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
3/5
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled on-chain, crossed = signed, and not settled on-chain.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPOn-chain txLatency
09-16 18:02settled (nonce-bound)2000x7ba6a2ca…504817485 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 no_declarationWhose side: no failure (delivered)
09-10 12:09settled (nonce-bound)tx from our index—0x3632681b…2cb620249 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: vet402 unproven
08-27 12:31settled (amount + payee)tx from our index—0xb5c76a85…a7de20292 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: vet402 unproven
08-20 12:55settle_failed——20489 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: vet402 unproven
08-14 09:56settle_failed——20496 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: vet402 unproven

Embed this record

Run this endpoint? Show the settle-through record vet402 measured — the badge reads 3/5 settled · 1 delivered and updates as the record grows. It carries the host it is about and the date it was last measured, so a saved copy cannot pass itself off as current. It states a measurement, not a rating.

vet402: 3 of 5 paid attempts settled with an on-chain receipt, and 1 of those also returned a 2xx response. settled is the confirmed transfer; delivered is the response arriving. A measurement of what happened when vet402 paid this endpoint, not a recommendation. (api.slamai.dev · measured 2026-09-16)

[![vet402 receipt](https://vet402.com/api/badge/endpoint/8ea73cf1-1794-423d-b7bd-70b4d29adf2c.svg)](https://vet402.com/observatory/e/8ea73cf1-1794-423d-b7bd-70b4d29adf2c)

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

No listing changes observed.

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.

20–2,000 characters · 0 so far