Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: passLast probed: 2026-11-12 · 2 days ago

api.loyalspark.online/x402-gateway/programs

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://api.loyalspark.online/x402-gateway/programs
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodGET
Catalog networkeip155:8453
Receiving address0x40a8cdd6a10ec1a8cb3dfb2834675e7a2cf4ad8b
Declared price (base units)1000
Catalog statusactive
First seen / last seen2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-11-14 08:05 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)49 / 15

2.Probe history

2026-08-142026-11-12
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 26 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-11-12 16:40 UTCGETpass402701 ms—
2026-11-10 13:40 UTCGETpass402637 ms—
2026-11-08 04:40 UTCGETpass402788 ms—
2026-11-05 22:40 UTCGETpass402645 ms—
2026-11-03 21:40 UTCGETpass402344 ms—
2026-10-31 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402407 ms—
2026-10-29 22:40 UTCGETpass402235 ms—
2026-10-28 04:40 UTCGETpass402570 ms—
2026-10-26 06:40 UTCGETpass402259 ms—
2026-10-24 13:40 UTCGETpass402346 ms—
2026-10-22 16:40 UTCGETpass402427 ms—
2026-10-21 04:40 UTCGETpass402401 ms—
2026-10-19 16:40 UTCGETpass402384 ms—
2026-10-18 04:40 UTCGETpass402306 ms—
2026-10-16 21:40 UTCGETpass402728 ms—
2026-10-15 12:40 UTCPOSTpass402394 ms—
2026-10-14 03:40 UTCPOSTpass402440 ms—
2026-10-01 10:30 UTCGETpass402173 ms—
2026-09-25 10:31 UTCGETpass402163 ms—
2026-09-21 11:24 UTCGETpass402235 ms—
2026-09-17 16:19 UTCGETpass402363 ms—
2026-09-14 11:24 UTCGETpass402108 ms—
2026-09-11 11:24 UTCGETpass402358 ms—
2026-09-07 11:24 UTCGETpass402135 ms—
2026-09-02 11:24 UTCGETpass402192 ms—
2026-08-14 08:52 UTCGETfail402119 msaccepts_invalidRecorded before the 2026-09-29 change, when the probe read only the first 4,000 bytes of the 402 body; this body began like an x402 envelope, so the fail may be vet402's measuring error rather than the seller's.

3.L1 — real purchases

3 of 4 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 3 of those also returned a deliverable 2xx response (delivered: other than 202 Accepted with a non-empty body). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read matched the one-time value stored for that purchase, so the transaction is the one for this purchase. Stellar is not in this count. The Stellar re-read checks payer, payee, amount and asset. A row reads as amount + payee when the re-read matched payer, payee, amount and asset and did not bind a one-time value. That tier holds rows from before 2026-09-04 and Stellar rows. They keep the settled label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer vet402 confirmed on-chain. delivered is a 2xx other than 202 with a non-empty body. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered. definitions.

A row marked tx from our index came back with no settlement receipt from the seller. Our own index of on-chain settlements found the transfer afterwards — our payer, this endpoint's payee, the exact amount, inside the time window — and the row goes through the same on-chain re-read as any other before it reads settled. The seller did not name that transaction; we did (methodology).

1 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (0 settled and answered 4xx, 1 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).

Terms in this table

settled (nonce-bound)
vet402 re-read the transfer on-chain in that chain's pinned settlement asset, and the on-chain re-read matched the one-time value stored for that purchase, so the transaction is the one for this purchase. Stellar is not in this count.
settle_failed
vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
unsettled_4xx
held_reason in the export: the paid request got a 4xx with no settlement receipt and no transaction.
L2 no_declaration
the listing's output schema gave vet402 nothing to check this response against (no schema, a schema with no required keys and no example properties, or example properties with a content type that is not JSON). An output example in the 402 (extensions.bazaar.info.output.example) counts as a declaration. When the catalog also declares an output, the example's top-level keys are required. When it does not, vet402 checks that the response is a JSON object or array, and the record page reads match (no required keys).
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Stage delivered
vet402 re-read the payment on the chain and the paid request returned HTTP 2xx other than 202 Accepted with a body vet402 did not record as empty.
Stage inconclusive
vet402 holds the row because the paid HTTP response was 4xx, or vet402's payer wallet was unfunded in a recorded window. vet402 keeps the row public in its own stage, apart from delivered and not_delivered.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “attribution under review”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
3/4
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled on-chain, crossed = signed, and not settled on-chain.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPOn-chain txPayment chainLatency
11-06 18:02settled (nonce-bound)2000xd59c6a10…87b5Base4558 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 no_declarationWhose side: no failure (delivered)Stage: delivered
10-27 21:32settled (nonce-bound)tx from our index2000x434ec8cf…2af1Base4510 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 no_declarationWhose side: no failure (delivered)Stage: delivered
10-21 18:01settled (nonce-bound)tx from our index2000xaba7097b…588eBase3534 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 no_declarationWhose side: no failure (delivered)Stage: delivered
10-15 17:01settle_failed401—Base361 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: no chargeStage: inconclusive

Embed this record

Run this endpoint? Show the settle-through record vet402 measured — the badge reads 3/4 settled · 3 delivered · 1 inconclusive and updates as the record grows. It carries the host it is about and the date it was last measured, so a saved copy cannot pass itself off as current. It states a measurement, not a rating.

vet402: 3 of 4 paid attempts settled with an on-chain receipt, and 3 of those also returned a deliverable HTTP 2xx response. settled is the confirmed transfer; delivered is a 2xx other than 202 with a non-empty body. 1 paid attempt is held as inconclusive rather than counted against the seller: a paid request that answered 4xx, settled or not, can be our own request being malformed, because vet402 buys with no API key and sends a request body only when the seller declares one; and a 402 or 5xx from 2026-09-13 to 2026-09-15 came while vet402's own payer wallet was out of USDC. A measurement of what happened when vet402 paid this endpoint, not a recommendation. (api.loyalspark.online · measured 2026-11-06)

[![vet402 receipt](https://vet402.com/api/badge/endpoint/a2b48432-8177-4920-9dba-9b89d045f900.svg)](https://vet402.com/observatory/e/a2b48432-8177-4920-9dba-9b89d045f900)

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

No listing changes observed.

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

A dispute does not start a purchase. The signed dispute route runs one fresh L0 check, an unpaid request.

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight. If it was right, it stands. A dispute filed on the record form puts an active listing on a priority list. L0 runs probe that list before their ordinary queue, one run at a time. A listing whose URL has an unfilled path parameter is not put on that list. One run measures up to 50 priority listings, at most 5 from one site. Published fails whose catalog declaration changed, or that rest on probes recorded under earlier rules, take places first, and disputes fill the places left. A listing probed in the past 60 minutes waits for a later run. A dispute that no run reaches within 7 days leaves the list. The scheduled L0 run is at 10:30 UTC, and an L0 run at another time can measure the listing first. The record stays on this page. When a run measures the listing, the new probe is added to its history. Send the dispute to support@vet402.com. Published corrections are listed at /corrections. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference). That route runs one fresh L0 check under the normal publication gate. A later purchase comes from the regular schedule.

20–2,000 characters · 0 so far