api.loyalspark.online/x402-gateway/programs
1.Catalog declaration
| Resource URL | https://api.loyalspark.online/x402-gateway/programs |
| Source | cdp_bazaar |
| Declared method | GET |
| Catalog network | eip155:8453 |
| Receiving address | 0x40a8cdd6a10ec1a8cb3dfb2834675e7a2cf4ad8b |
| Declared price (base units) | 1000 |
| Catalog status | active |
| First seen / last seen | 2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-11-14 08:05 UTC |
| Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d) | 49 / 15 |
2.Probe history
| Probed at | Method | Verdict | HTTP | Latency | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-12 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 701 ms | — |
| 2026-11-10 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 637 ms | — |
| 2026-11-08 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 788 ms | — |
| 2026-11-05 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 645 ms | — |
| 2026-11-03 21:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 344 ms | — |
| 2026-10-31 22:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 407 ms | — |
| 2026-10-29 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 235 ms | — |
| 2026-10-28 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 570 ms | — |
| 2026-10-26 06:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 259 ms | — |
| 2026-10-24 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 346 ms | — |
| 2026-10-22 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 427 ms | — |
| 2026-10-21 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 401 ms | — |
| 2026-10-19 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 384 ms | — |
| 2026-10-18 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 306 ms | — |
| 2026-10-16 21:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 728 ms | — |
| 2026-10-15 12:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 394 ms | — |
| 2026-10-14 03:40 UTC | POST | pass | 402 | 440 ms | — |
| 2026-10-01 10:30 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 173 ms | — |
| 2026-09-25 10:31 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 163 ms | — |
| 2026-09-21 11:24 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 235 ms | — |
| 2026-09-17 16:19 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 363 ms | — |
| 2026-09-14 11:24 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 108 ms | — |
| 2026-09-11 11:24 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 358 ms | — |
| 2026-09-07 11:24 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 135 ms | — |
| 2026-09-02 11:24 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 192 ms | — |
| 2026-08-14 08:52 UTC | GET | fail | 402 | 119 ms | accepts_invalidRecorded before the 2026-09-29 change, when the probe read only the first 4,000 bytes of the 402 body; this body began like an x402 envelope, so the fail may be vet402's measuring error rather than the seller's. |
3.L1 — real purchases
3 of 4 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 3 of those also returned a deliverable 2xx response (delivered: other than 202 Accepted with a non-empty body). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read matched the one-time value stored for that purchase, so the transaction is the one for this purchase. Stellar is not in this count. The Stellar re-read checks payer, payee, amount and asset. A row reads as amount + payee when the re-read matched payer, payee, amount and asset and did not bind a one-time value. That tier holds rows from before 2026-09-04 and Stellar rows. They keep the settled label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer vet402 confirmed on-chain. delivered is a 2xx other than 202 with a non-empty body. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered. definitions.
A row marked tx from our index came back with no settlement receipt from the seller. Our own index of on-chain settlements found the transfer afterwards — our payer, this endpoint's payee, the exact amount, inside the time window — and the row goes through the same on-chain re-read as any other before it reads settled. The seller did not name that transaction; we did (methodology).
1 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (0 settled and answered 4xx, 1 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).
Terms in this table
settled (nonce-bound)- vet402 re-read the transfer on-chain in that chain's pinned settlement asset, and the on-chain re-read matched the one-time value stored for that purchase, so the transaction is the one for this purchase. Stellar is not in this count.
settle_failed- vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
unsettled_4xx- held_reason in the export: the paid request got a 4xx with no settlement receipt and no transaction.
L2 no_declaration- the listing's output schema gave vet402 nothing to check this response against (no schema, a schema with no required keys and no example properties, or example properties with a content type that is not JSON). An output example in the 402 (extensions.bazaar.info.output.example) counts as a declaration. When the catalog also declares an output, the example's top-level keys are required. When it does not, vet402 checks that the response is a JSON object or array, and the record page reads match (no required keys).
L2 not_checked- not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Stage delivered- vet402 re-read the payment on the chain and the paid request returned HTTP 2xx other than 202 Accepted with a body vet402 did not record as empty.
Stage inconclusive- vet402 holds the row because the paid HTTP response was 4xx, or vet402's payer wallet was unfunded in a recorded window. vet402 keeps the row public in its own stage, apart from delivered and not_delivered.
Whose side- the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “attribution under review”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
| Attempted at | Result | HTTP | On-chain tx | Payment chain | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11-06 18:022026-11-06 18:02 UTC | settled (nonce-bound) | 200 | 0xd59c6a10…87b5 | Base | 4558 ms |
| 1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 no_declarationWhose side: no failure (delivered)Stage: delivered | |||||
| 10-27 21:322026-10-27 21:32 UTC | settled (nonce-bound)tx from our index | 200 | 0x434ec8cf…2af1 | Base | 4510 ms |
| 1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 no_declarationWhose side: no failure (delivered)Stage: delivered | |||||
| 10-21 18:012026-10-21 18:01 UTC | settled (nonce-bound)tx from our index | 200 | 0xaba7097b…588e | Base | 3534 ms |
| 1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 no_declarationWhose side: no failure (delivered)Stage: delivered | |||||
| 10-15 17:012026-10-15 17:01 UTC | settle_failed | 401 | — | Base | 361 ms |
| 1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: no chargeStage: inconclusive | |||||
Embed this record
Run this endpoint? Show the settle-through record vet402 measured — the badge reads 3/4 settled · 3 delivered · 1 inconclusive and updates as the record grows. It carries the host it is about and the date it was last measured, so a saved copy cannot pass itself off as current. It states a measurement, not a rating.
[](https://vet402.com/observatory/e/a2b48432-8177-4920-9dba-9b89d045f900)4.Catalog listing events
No listing changes observed.
unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.
5.Dispute this record
A dispute does not start a purchase. The signed dispute route runs one fresh L0 check, an unpaid request.
Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight. If it was right, it stands. A dispute filed on the record form puts an active listing on a priority list. L0 runs probe that list before their ordinary queue, one run at a time. A listing whose URL has an unfilled path parameter is not put on that list. One run measures up to 50 priority listings, at most 5 from one site. Published fails whose catalog declaration changed, or that rest on probes recorded under earlier rules, take places first, and disputes fill the places left. A listing probed in the past 60 minutes waits for a later run. A dispute that no run reaches within 7 days leaves the list. The scheduled L0 run is at 10:30 UTC, and an L0 run at another time can measure the listing first. The record stays on this page. When a run measures the listing, the new probe is added to its history. Send the dispute to support@vet402.com. Published corrections are listed at /corrections. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference). That route runs one fresh L0 check under the normal publication gate. A later purchase comes from the regular schedule.