Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: passLast probed: 2026-09-28 · 4 days ago

api.messari.io/funding/v1/rounds

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://api.messari.io/funding/v1/rounds
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodGET
Networkeip155:8453
Receiving address0x75ddd3c42eace13c59ea0cd1141b886a1c70d2a5
Declared price (base units)150000
Catalog statusdelisted (since 2026-09-28 23:00 UTC)
First seen / last seen2026-08-14 08:52 UTC / 2026-09-28 01:02 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)1 / 1

2.Probe history

2026-09-082026-09-28
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 30 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-09-28 16:40 UTCGETpass402208 ms—
2026-09-27 22:40 UTCGETpass402400 ms—
2026-09-27 04:40 UTCGETpass402650 ms—
2026-09-26 13:40 UTCGETpass402460 ms—
2026-09-25 16:40 UTCGETpass402180 ms—
2026-09-24 22:40 UTCGETpass402427 ms—
2026-09-24 04:40 UTCGETpass402358 ms—
2026-09-23 13:40 UTCGETpass402146 ms—
2026-09-22 16:40 UTCGETpass402453 ms—
2026-09-21 22:40 UTCGETpass402388 ms—
2026-09-21 04:40 UTCGETpass402320 ms—
2026-09-20 16:40 UTCGETpass402559 ms—
2026-09-19 22:40 UTCGETpass402171 ms—
2026-09-19 04:40 UTCGETpass4022194 ms—
2026-09-18 13:40 UTCGETpass402314 ms—
2026-09-17 16:40 UTCGETpass402795 ms—
2026-09-17 04:40 UTCGETpass402735 ms—
2026-09-16 13:40 UTCGETpass402132 ms—
2026-09-15 13:40 UTCGETpass402307 ms—
2026-09-14 22:40 UTCGETpass402272 ms—
2026-09-14 04:40 UTCGETpass402195 ms—
2026-09-13 16:40 UTCGETpass402207 ms—
2026-09-12 22:40 UTCGETpass402350 ms—
2026-09-12 13:40 UTCGETpass402291 ms—
2026-09-11 22:40 UTCGETpass402515 ms—
2026-09-11 04:40 UTCGETpass402660 ms—
2026-09-10 17:40 UTCGETpass402266 ms—
2026-09-10 05:40 UTCGETpass402295 ms—
2026-09-09 14:40 UTCGETpass402129 ms—
2026-09-08 23:40 UTCGETpass402145 ms—

3.L1 — real purchases

1 of 2 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 1 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.

A row marked tx from our index came back with no settlement receipt from the seller. Our own index of on-chain settlements found the transfer afterwards — our payer, this endpoint's payee, the exact amount, inside the time window — and the row goes through the same on-chain re-read as any other before it reads settled. The seller did not name that transaction; we did (methodology).

1 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (0 settled and answered 4xx, 1 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).

1 of the paid attempts failed on vet402's side (for example our wallet was out of USDC, or we did not send the input the listing declares). The rows stay in the table; the embeddable badge below leaves them out of its count and names them as “vet402 side”.

Terms in this table

settle_failed
vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
settled (amount + payee)
vet402 confirmed the USDC transfer on-chain; the on-chain re-read matched amount, payee, asset and chain; no nonce was on record (rows before 2026-09-04).
unsettled_4xx
held_reason in the export: the paid request got a 4xx with no settlement receipt and no transaction.
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
L2 mismatch
the response lacked fields the listing's output schema declares.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
1/2
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled on-chain, crossed = signed, and not settled on-chain.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPOn-chain txLatency
09-13 06:01settle_failed403—461 ms
150000 units (≈ $0.15 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: vet402's side
08-30 12:07settled (amount + payee)tx from our index2000x9d54b9b2…3e5d8885 ms
150000 units (≈ $0.15 USDC) · L2 mismatchWhose side: no failure (delivered)

Embed this record

Run this endpoint? Show the settle-through record vet402 measured — the badge reads 1/1 settled · 1 delivered · vet402 side 1 and updates as the record grows. It carries the host it is about and the date it was last measured, so a saved copy cannot pass itself off as current. It states a measurement, not a rating.

vet402: 1 of 1 paid attempts settled with an on-chain receipt, and 1 of those also returned a 2xx response. settled is the confirmed transfer; delivered is the response arriving. 1 further paid attempt failed on vet402's side (for example its wallet was out of USDC, or it did not send the input the listing declares) and is left out of these counts. A measurement of what happened when vet402 paid this endpoint, not a recommendation. (api.messari.io · measured 2026-09-13)

[![vet402 receipt](https://vet402.com/api/badge/endpoint/a3eefbdf-3ee8-4423-b9c2-5d4af715eadc.svg)](https://vet402.com/observatory/e/a3eefbdf-3ee8-4423-b9c2-5d4af715eadc)

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

Catalog listing events, newest first
Detected onEventBeforeAfter
2026-09-28delisted{"status":"active"}{"status":"delisted"}

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.

20–2,000 characters · 0 so far