x402.twit.sh/tweets/by/id
1.Catalog declaration
| Resource URL | https://x402.twit.sh/tweets/by/id |
| Source | cdp_bazaar |
| Declared method | GET |
| Network | eip155:8453 |
| Receiving address | 0x9dba414637c611a16bea6f0796bfcbcbdc410df8 |
| Declared price (base units) | 2500 |
| Catalog status | active |
| First seen / last seen | 2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-10-03 01:04 UTC |
| Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d) | 398 / 13 |
2.Probe history
| Probed at | Method | Verdict | HTTP | Latency | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-04 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 124 ms | — |
| 2026-10-03 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 105 ms | — |
| 2026-10-02 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 402 ms | — |
| 2026-10-01 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 224 ms | — |
| 2026-09-30 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 244 ms | — |
| 2026-09-30 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 291 ms | — |
| 2026-09-29 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 618 ms | — |
| 2026-09-28 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 370 ms | — |
| 2026-09-27 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 271 ms | — |
| 2026-09-27 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 288 ms | — |
| 2026-09-26 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 120 ms | — |
| 2026-09-25 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 225 ms | — |
| 2026-09-25 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 181 ms | — |
| 2026-09-24 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 190 ms | — |
| 2026-09-23 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 99 ms | — |
| 2026-09-22 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 157 ms | — |
| 2026-09-22 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 199 ms | — |
| 2026-09-21 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 2106 ms | — |
| 2026-09-20 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 283 ms | — |
| 2026-09-19 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 268 ms | — |
| 2026-09-19 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 146 ms | — |
| 2026-09-18 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 141 ms | — |
| 2026-09-17 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 169 ms | — |
| 2026-09-17 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 101 ms | — |
| 2026-09-16 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 141 ms | — |
| 2026-09-15 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 298 ms | — |
| 2026-09-14 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 516 ms | — |
| 2026-09-14 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 144 ms | — |
| 2026-09-13 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 362 ms | — |
| 2026-09-13 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 122 ms | — |
3.L1 — real purchases
0 of 3 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 0 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.
3 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (0 settled and answered 4xx, 3 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).
Terms in this table
settle_failed- vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
unsettled_4xx- held_reason in the export: the paid request got a 4xx with no settlement receipt and no transaction.
L2 not_checked- not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Whose side- the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
| Attempted at | Result | HTTP | On-chain tx | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09-10 01:002026-09-10 01:00 UTC | settle_failed | 404 | — | 698 ms |
| 2500 units (≈ $0.0025 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: no charge | ||||
| 09-08 19:002026-09-08 19:00 UTC | settle_failed | 404 | — | 600 ms |
| 2500 units (≈ $0.0025 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: no charge | ||||
| 09-02 07:002026-09-02 07:00 UTC | settle_failed | 404 | — | 528 ms |
| 2500 units (≈ $0.0025 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: no charge | ||||
4.Catalog listing events
No listing changes observed.
unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.
5.Dispute this record
Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.