Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: passLast probed: 2026-10-06 · 1 day ago

asistent-crypto.vercel.app/api/x402/query

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://asistent-crypto.vercel.app/api/x402/query
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodPOST
Networkeip155:8453
Receiving address0xbeebd30639e99bbce11faa2b463fcccf6215831b
Declared price (base units)40000
Catalog statusactive
First seen / last seen2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-10-07 01:03 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)2 / 1

2.Probe history

2026-09-142026-10-06
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 30 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-10-06 22:40 UTCPOSTpass40284 ms—
2026-10-06 04:41 UTCPOSTpass402377 ms—
2026-10-04 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402224 ms—
2026-10-03 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402341 ms—
2026-10-03 04:40 UTCPOSTpass40283 ms—
2026-10-02 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402563 ms—
2026-10-01 13:40 UTCPOSTpass40268 ms—
2026-09-30 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402135 ms—
2026-09-29 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402106 ms—
2026-09-29 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402293 ms—
2026-09-28 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402501 ms—
2026-09-27 16:40 UTCPOSTpass40285 ms—
2026-09-26 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402174 ms—
2026-09-26 04:40 UTCPOSTpass40259 ms—
2026-09-25 13:40 UTCPOSTpass40253 ms—
2026-09-24 16:40 UTCPOSTpass40299 ms—
2026-09-23 22:40 UTCPOSTpass40239 ms—
2026-09-23 04:40 UTCPOSTpass40252 ms—
2026-09-22 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402119 ms—
2026-09-21 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402209 ms—
2026-09-21 04:40 UTCPOSTpass40286 ms—
2026-09-20 13:40 UTCPOSTpass4022135 ms—
2026-09-19 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402163 ms—
2026-09-18 22:40 UTCPOSTpass40252 ms—
2026-09-18 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402453 ms—
2026-09-17 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402130 ms—
2026-09-16 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402324 ms—
2026-09-15 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402146 ms—
2026-09-15 13:40 UTCPOSTpass40244 ms—
2026-09-14 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402324 ms—

3.L1 — real purchases

0 of 2 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 0 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.

1 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (0 settled and answered 4xx, 1 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).

1 of the paid attempts failed on vet402's side (for example our wallet was out of USDC, or we did not send the input the listing declares). The rows stay in the table.

Terms in this table

settle_claimed
the seller returned a receipt that vet402 has not re-read on-chain yet.
settle_failed
vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
unsettled_4xx
held_reason in the export: the paid request got a 4xx with no settlement receipt and no transaction.
L2 no_declaration
the listing declares no output schema to check the response against.
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
0/2
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled on-chain, crossed = signed, and not settled on-chain.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPOn-chain txLatency
10-06 21:32settle_claimed2000x8897c9bf…74b63826 ms
40000 units (≈ $0.04 USDC) · L2 no_declarationWhose side: not sorted: awaiting on-chain verification
09-12 12:07settle_failed400—1030 ms
50000 units (≈ $0.05 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: vet402's side

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

No listing changes observed.

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.

20–2,000 characters · 0 so far

asistent-crypto.vercel.app/api/x402/query — x402 purchase and probe record | vet402