imagegen.coinopai.com/generate/clean
1.Catalog declaration
| Resource URL | https://imagegen.coinopai.com/generate/clean |
| Source | cdp_bazaar |
| Declared method | GET |
| Network | eip155:8453 |
| Receiving address | 0x4c1a4fce51fea51f128a01cce8becb106d391155 |
| Declared price (base units) | 350000 |
| Catalog status | active |
| First seen / last seen | 2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-09-30 01:03 UTC |
| Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d) | 1 / 1 |
2.Probe history
| Probed at | Method | Verdict | HTTP | Latency | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-30 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 221 ms | — |
| 2026-09-30 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 285 ms | — |
| 2026-09-29 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 63 ms | — |
| 2026-09-28 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 98 ms | — |
| 2026-09-27 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 43 ms | — |
| 2026-09-27 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 182 ms | — |
| 2026-09-26 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 90 ms | — |
| 2026-09-25 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 125 ms | — |
| 2026-09-25 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 238 ms | — |
| 2026-09-24 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 341 ms | — |
| 2026-09-23 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 274 ms | — |
| 2026-09-22 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 373 ms | — |
| 2026-09-22 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 312 ms | — |
| 2026-09-21 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 21 ms | — |
| 2026-09-20 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 78 ms | — |
| 2026-09-19 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 25 ms | — |
| 2026-09-19 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 282 ms | — |
| 2026-09-17 16:19 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 113 ms | — |
| 2026-09-15 11:24 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 139 ms | — |
| 2026-09-11 11:24 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 108 ms | — |
| 2026-09-07 11:24 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 86 ms | — |
| 2026-09-02 11:25 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 122 ms | — |
| 2026-08-19 10:56 UTC | GET | fail | 402 | 44 ms | accepts_invalid402 without a payable accept in the header or the body (which part was missing was not recorded before the 2026-09-29 change). |
3.L1 — real purchases
1 of 1 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 1 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.
Terms in this table
settled (nonce-bound)- vet402 confirmed the USDC transfer on-chain, and the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time nonce vet402 signed for that purchase.
L2 match- the response had the fields the listing's output schema declares.
Whose side- the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
| Attempted at | Result | HTTP | On-chain tx | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09-20 06:002026-09-20 06:00 UTC | settled (nonce-bound) | 200 | 0xd0111af8…df9d | 14869 ms |
| 350000 units (≈ $0.35 USDC) · L2 matchWhose side: no failure (delivered) | ||||
Embed this record
Run this endpoint? Show the settle-through record vet402 measured — the badge reads 1/1 settled · 1 delivered and updates as the record grows. It carries the host it is about and the date it was last measured, so a saved copy cannot pass itself off as current. It states a measurement, not a rating.
[](https://vet402.com/observatory/e/bb9e06ed-bf93-45cf-bf30-e94ca896b344)4.Catalog listing events
No listing changes observed.
unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.
5.Dispute this record
Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.