Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: passLast probed: 2026-09-28 · 1 day ago

stable-people-data-git-pdl-signoz-usage-alarms-merit-systems.vercel.app/api/pdl/company/enrich

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://stable-people-data-git-pdl-signoz-usage-alarms-merit-systems.vercel.app/api/pdl/company/enrich
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodPOST
Networkeip155:8453
Receiving address0x7f33b3c113915a0f2981070553ba9538c0f90171
Declared price (base units)20000
Catalog statusactive
First seen / last seen2026-08-14 08:52 UTC / 2026-09-29 01:03 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)76 / 2

2.Probe history

2026-08-302026-09-28
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 7 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-09-28 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402182 ms—
2026-09-28 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402198 ms—
2026-09-27 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402134 ms—
2026-09-26 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402122 ms—
2026-09-25 22:40 UTCPOSTpass4022224 ms—
2026-09-25 10:30 UTCPOSTpass402163 ms—
2026-08-30 11:24 UTCPOSTfail402225 msaccepts_invalid

3.L1 — real purchases

0 of 1 paid attempts settled with a receipt, and 0 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash — the receipt is the evidence. A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.

Terms in this table

settle_failed
vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
0/1
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled with an on-chain receipt, crossed = paid but no receipt.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPReceipt (tx)Latency
09-26 00:00settle_failed500—659 ms
20000 units (≈ $0.02 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: vet402 unproven

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

Catalog listing events, newest first
Detected onEventBeforeAfter
2026-09-25relisted{"status":"delisted"}{"status":"active"}
2026-08-31delisted{"status":"active"}{"status":"delisted"}

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.