Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: passLast probed: 2026-09-28 · 1 day ago

mcpfax-intel.bowling-anthony.workers.dev/movers

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://mcpfax-intel.bowling-anthony.workers.dev/movers
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodGET
Networkeip155:8453
Receiving address0x1831f336585a6c67b6a954d28f3e07f44c4eebbd
Declared price (base units)10000
Catalog statusactive
First seen / last seen2026-08-14 08:52 UTC / 2026-09-29 01:03 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)2 / 1

2.Probe history

2026-09-082026-09-28
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 30 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-09-28 16:40 UTCGETpass402241 ms—
2026-09-27 22:40 UTCGETpass402403 ms—
2026-09-27 04:40 UTCGETpass402287 ms—
2026-09-26 13:40 UTCGETpass40295 ms—
2026-09-25 16:40 UTCGETpass402213 ms—
2026-09-24 22:40 UTCGETpass40260 ms—
2026-09-24 04:40 UTCGETpass402160 ms—
2026-09-23 13:40 UTCGETpass402312 ms—
2026-09-22 16:40 UTCGETpass402372 ms—
2026-09-22 04:40 UTCGETpass402122 ms—
2026-09-21 13:40 UTCGETpass4022184 ms—
2026-09-20 16:40 UTCGETpass402390 ms—
2026-09-19 22:40 UTCGETpass402275 ms—
2026-09-19 04:40 UTCGETpass40261 ms—
2026-09-18 13:40 UTCGETpass402156 ms—
2026-09-17 22:40 UTCGETpass402180 ms—
2026-09-17 04:40 UTCGETpass40282 ms—
2026-09-16 13:40 UTCGETpass402307 ms—
2026-09-15 16:40 UTCGETpass402141 ms—
2026-09-14 22:40 UTCGETpass40227 ms—
2026-09-14 13:40 UTCGETpass40275 ms—
2026-09-13 16:40 UTCGETpass40212 ms—
2026-09-13 04:40 UTCGETpass40225 ms—
2026-09-12 13:40 UTCGETpass4021958 ms—
2026-09-11 22:40 UTCGETpass40230 ms—
2026-09-11 13:40 UTCGETpass40287 ms—
2026-09-10 17:40 UTCGETpass402198 ms—
2026-09-10 05:40 UTCGETpass402306 ms—
2026-09-09 17:40 UTCGETpass402508 ms—
2026-09-08 23:40 UTCGETfail4022094 msprice_mismatchAmount or asset differs from the catalog declaration (the values compared were not recorded before the 2026-09-29 change).

3.L1 — real purchases

0 of 2 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 0 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.

2 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (0 settled and answered 4xx, 2 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).

Terms in this table

settle_failed
vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
unsettled_4xx
held_reason in the export: the paid request got a 4xx with no settlement receipt and no transaction.
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
0/2
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled on-chain, crossed = signed, and not settled on-chain.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPOn-chain txLatency
09-15 23:51settle_failed404—504 ms
10000 units (≈ $0.01 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: no charge
09-09 19:00settle_failed404—739 ms
10000 units (≈ $0.01 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: no charge

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

No listing changes observed.

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.

About the purchase at 2026-09-09T19:00:49Z (UTC). The form starts with that time; add what you saw instead.

20–2,000 characters · 59 so far

mcpfax-intel.bowling-anthony.workers.dev/movers — x402 purchase and probe record | vet402