Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: passLast probed: 2026-11-11 · 3 days ago

palmyr.ai/social/twitter/profile

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://palmyr.ai/social/twitter/profile
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodPOST
Catalog networksolana:5eykt4UsFv8P8NJdTREpY1vzqKqZKvdp
Receiving addressGqSs5L9aPWGJwyRQe35YKQaWMDPh3R1dMqfSEPhSgkM
Declared price (base units)1000
Catalog statusactive
First seen / last seen2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-11-14 10:05 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)15 / 7

2.Probe history

2026-09-192026-11-11
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 30 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-11-11 14:31 UTCPOSTpass402738 ms—
2026-10-13 03:40 UTCPOSTpass402417 ms—
2026-10-12 03:40 UTCPOSTpass402427 ms—
2026-10-11 03:40 UTCPOSTpass402380 ms—
2026-10-10 03:40 UTCPOSTpass402371 ms—
2026-10-08 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402408 ms—
2026-10-07 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402444 ms—
2026-10-06 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402321 ms—
2026-10-05 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402448 ms—
2026-10-04 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402381 ms—
2026-10-03 22:40 UTCPOSTpass4022290 ms—
2026-10-02 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402477 ms—
2026-10-02 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402379 ms—
2026-10-01 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402601 ms—
2026-09-30 16:40 UTCPOSTpass4022503 ms—
2026-09-29 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402482 ms—
2026-09-29 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402523 ms—
2026-09-28 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402571 ms—
2026-09-27 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402566 ms—
2026-09-26 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402409 ms—
2026-09-26 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402473 ms—
2026-09-25 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402245 ms—
2026-09-24 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402406 ms—
2026-09-23 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402419 ms—
2026-09-23 04:40 UTCPOSTpass402761 ms—
2026-09-22 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402201 ms—
2026-09-21 16:40 UTCPOSTpass402303 ms—
2026-09-20 22:40 UTCPOSTpass402645 ms—
2026-09-20 04:40 UTCPOSTpass4022244 ms—
2026-09-19 13:40 UTCPOSTpass402474 ms—

3.L1 — real purchases

3 of 4 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 0 of those also returned a deliverable 2xx response (delivered: other than 202 Accepted with a non-empty body). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read matched the one-time value stored for that purchase, so the transaction is the one for this purchase. Stellar is not in this count. The Stellar re-read checks payer, payee, amount and asset. A row reads as amount + payee when the re-read matched payer, payee, amount and asset and did not bind a one-time value. That tier holds rows from before 2026-09-04 and Stellar rows. They keep the settled label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer vet402 confirmed on-chain. delivered is a 2xx other than 202 with a non-empty body. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered. definitions.

3 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (3 settled and answered 4xx, 0 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).

Terms in this table

settle_failed
vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
settled (nonce-bound)
vet402 re-read the transfer on-chain in that chain's pinned settlement asset, and the on-chain re-read matched the one-time value stored for that purchase, so the transaction is the one for this purchase. Stellar is not in this count.
settled (amount + payee)
vet402 re-read the transfer on-chain in that chain's pinned settlement asset: the on-chain re-read matched payer, payee, amount and asset and did not bind a one-time value (rows before 2026-09-04, and Stellar).
settled_4xx
held_reason in the export: the payment settled, then the paid request got a 4xx.
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Stage signed
vet402 signed a paid request. vet402 has not settled it on chain yet, or settlement failed, or the seller returned goods without a receipt.
Stage inconclusive
vet402 holds the row because the paid HTTP response was 4xx, or vet402's payer wallet was unfunded in a recorded window. vet402 keeps the row public in its own stage, apart from delivered and not_delivered.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “attribution under review”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
3/4
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled on-chain, crossed = signed, and not settled on-chain.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPOn-chain txPayment chainLatency
10-26 17:31settle_failed402—Solana872 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: vet402 unprovenStage: signed
09-14 18:01settled (nonce-bound)400R7DKDb1V5E…GrdASolana3369 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: charged, then rejected an input vet402 had not sentStage: inconclusive
08-24 23:38settled (amount + payee)4004MPEMdCx6N…VivuSolana2438 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: charged, then rejected an input vet402 had not sentStage: inconclusive
08-14 10:08settled (amount + payee)4000xa6804568…dd9fBase1519 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: charged, then rejected an input vet402 had not sentStage: inconclusive

Embed this record

Run this endpoint? Show the settle-through record vet402 measured — the badge reads 3/4 settled · 0 delivered · 3 inconclusive and updates as the record grows. It carries the host it is about and the date it was last measured, so a saved copy cannot pass itself off as current. It states a measurement, not a rating.

vet402: 3 of 4 paid attempts settled with an on-chain receipt, and 0 of those also returned a deliverable HTTP 2xx response. settled is the confirmed transfer; delivered is a 2xx other than 202 with a non-empty body. 3 paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against the seller: a paid request that answered 4xx, settled or not, can be our own request being malformed, because vet402 buys with no API key and sends a request body only when the seller declares one; and a 402 or 5xx from 2026-09-13 to 2026-09-15 came while vet402's own payer wallet was out of USDC. A measurement of what happened when vet402 paid this endpoint, not a recommendation. (palmyr.ai · measured 2026-10-26)

[![vet402 receipt](https://vet402.com/api/badge/endpoint/cd7a89dd-ee11-497a-9cd3-bf70009fa3bc.svg)](https://vet402.com/observatory/e/cd7a89dd-ee11-497a-9cd3-bf70009fa3bc)

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

No listing changes observed.

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

A dispute does not start a purchase. The signed dispute route runs one fresh L0 check, an unpaid request.

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight. If it was right, it stands. A dispute filed on the record form puts an active listing on a priority list. L0 runs probe that list before their ordinary queue, one run at a time. A listing whose URL has an unfilled path parameter is not put on that list. One run measures up to 50 priority listings, at most 5 from one site. Published fails whose catalog declaration changed, or that rest on probes recorded under earlier rules, take places first, and disputes fill the places left. A listing probed in the past 60 minutes waits for a later run. A dispute that no run reaches within 7 days leaves the list. The scheduled L0 run is at 10:30 UTC, and an L0 run at another time can measure the listing first. The record stays on this page. When a run measures the listing, the new probe is added to its history. Send the dispute to support@vet402.com. Published corrections are listed at /corrections. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference). That route runs one fresh L0 check under the normal publication gate. A later purchase comes from the regular schedule.

20–2,000 characters · 0 so far