Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: passLast probed: 2026-09-30 · 1 day ago

api.usenami.io/v1/perp/volume-24h

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://api.usenami.io/v1/perp/volume-24h
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodGET
Networkeip155:8453
Receiving address0x1538726707212f4db3eb67cec0910422a310475c
Declared price (base units)1000
Catalog statusactive
First seen / last seen2026-08-14 08:52 UTC / 2026-10-01 01:03 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)2 / 2

2.Probe history

2026-09-102026-09-30
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 30 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-09-30 13:40 UTCGETpass402790 ms—
2026-09-29 16:40 UTCGETpass402850 ms—
2026-09-28 22:40 UTCGETpass402725 ms—
2026-09-28 04:40 UTCGETpass402758 ms—
2026-09-27 16:40 UTCGETpass402763 ms—
2026-09-26 22:40 UTCGETpass402777 ms—
2026-09-26 04:40 UTCGETpass402726 ms—
2026-09-25 13:40 UTCGETpass402817 ms—
2026-09-24 16:40 UTCGETpass4021056 ms—
2026-09-23 22:40 UTCGETpass4021115 ms—
2026-09-23 04:40 UTCGETpass402383 ms—
2026-09-22 13:40 UTCGETpass4022458 ms—
2026-09-21 16:40 UTCGETpass402897 ms—
2026-09-20 22:40 UTCGETpass402519 ms—
2026-09-20 04:40 UTCGETpass402972 ms—
2026-09-19 13:40 UTCGETpass402592 ms—
2026-09-18 16:40 UTCGETpass402687 ms—
2026-09-17 22:40 UTCGETpass4021115 ms—
2026-09-17 13:40 UTCGETpass4021577 ms—
2026-09-16 16:40 UTCGETpass402900 ms—
2026-09-15 16:40 UTCGETpass402862 ms—
2026-09-15 04:40 UTCGETpass402870 ms—
2026-09-14 13:40 UTCGETpass402825 ms—
2026-09-13 22:40 UTCGETpass402946 ms—
2026-09-13 04:40 UTCGETpass402792 ms—
2026-09-12 16:40 UTCGETpass402888 ms—
2026-09-11 22:40 UTCGETpass402729 ms—
2026-09-11 13:40 UTCGETpass4022706 ms—
2026-09-10 17:40 UTCGETpass402724 ms—
2026-09-10 05:40 UTCGETpass4021172 ms—

3.L1 — real purchases

0 of 2 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 0 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.

2 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (0 settled and answered 4xx, 2 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).

Terms in this table

settle_failed
vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
unsettled_4xx
held_reason in the export: the paid request got a 4xx with no settlement receipt and no transaction.
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
0/2
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled on-chain, crossed = signed, and not settled on-chain.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPOn-chain txLatency
09-16 00:01settle_failed422—1525 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: no charge
09-09 07:00settle_failed422—1518 ms
1000 units (≈ $0.001 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: no charge

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

Catalog listing events, newest first
Detected onEventBeforeAfter
2026-08-31relisted{"status":"delisted"}{"status":"active"}
2026-08-30delisted{"status":"active"}{"status":"delisted"}

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.

20–2,000 characters · 0 so far