x402.twit.sh/lists/tweets
1.Catalog declaration
| Resource URL | https://x402.twit.sh/lists/tweets |
| Source | cdp_bazaar |
| Declared method | GET |
| Network | eip155:8453 |
| Receiving address | 0x9dba414637c611a16bea6f0796bfcbcbdc410df8 |
| Declared price (base units) | 10000 |
| Catalog status | active |
| First seen / last seen | 2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-10-03 01:04 UTC |
| Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d) | 57 / 3 |
2.Probe history
| Probed at | Method | Verdict | HTTP | Latency | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-04 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 202 ms | — |
| 2026-10-03 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 391 ms | — |
| 2026-10-03 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 304 ms | — |
| 2026-10-02 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 370 ms | — |
| 2026-10-01 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 298 ms | — |
| 2026-09-30 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 277 ms | — |
| 2026-09-29 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 686 ms | — |
| 2026-09-29 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 371 ms | — |
| 2026-09-28 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 229 ms | — |
| 2026-09-27 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 147 ms | — |
| 2026-09-26 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 249 ms | — |
| 2026-09-26 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 149 ms | — |
| 2026-09-25 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 569 ms | — |
| 2026-09-24 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 186 ms | — |
| 2026-09-24 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 440 ms | — |
| 2026-09-23 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 215 ms | — |
| 2026-09-22 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 321 ms | — |
| 2026-09-21 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 338 ms | — |
| 2026-09-21 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 154 ms | — |
| 2026-09-20 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 178 ms | — |
| 2026-09-19 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 299 ms | — |
| 2026-09-18 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 175 ms | — |
| 2026-09-18 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 295 ms | — |
| 2026-09-17 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 188 ms | — |
| 2026-09-16 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 230 ms | — |
| 2026-09-16 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 807 ms | — |
| 2026-09-15 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 164 ms | — |
| 2026-09-14 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 127 ms | — |
| 2026-09-14 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 156 ms | — |
| 2026-09-13 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 1841 ms | — |
3.L1 — real purchases
0 of 3 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 0 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.
3 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (0 settled and answered 4xx, 3 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).
Terms in this table
settle_failed- vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
unsettled_4xx- held_reason in the export: the paid request got a 4xx with no settlement receipt and no transaction.
L2 not_checked- not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Whose side- the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
| Attempted at | Result | HTTP | On-chain tx | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09-10 01:002026-09-10 01:00 UTC | settle_failed | 404 | — | 732 ms |
| 10000 units (≈ $0.01 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: no charge | ||||
| 09-08 19:002026-09-08 19:00 UTC | settle_failed | 404 | — | 671 ms |
| 10000 units (≈ $0.01 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: no charge | ||||
| 09-03 01:002026-09-03 01:00 UTC | settle_failed | 404 | — | 702 ms |
| 10000 units (≈ $0.01 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: no charge | ||||
4.Catalog listing events
No listing changes observed.
unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.
5.Dispute this record
Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.