Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: passLast probed: 2026-10-04 · 1 day ago

x402.twit.sh/lists/tweets

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://x402.twit.sh/lists/tweets
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodGET
Networkeip155:8453
Receiving address0x9dba414637c611a16bea6f0796bfcbcbdc410df8
Declared price (base units)10000
Catalog statusactive
First seen / last seen2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-10-03 01:04 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)57 / 3

2.Probe history

2026-09-132026-10-04
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 30 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-10-04 16:40 UTCGETpass402202 ms—
2026-10-03 22:40 UTCGETpass402391 ms—
2026-10-03 04:40 UTCGETpass402304 ms—
2026-10-02 13:40 UTCGETpass402370 ms—
2026-10-01 13:40 UTCGETpass402298 ms—
2026-09-30 16:40 UTCGETpass402277 ms—
2026-09-29 22:40 UTCGETpass402686 ms—
2026-09-29 04:40 UTCGETpass402371 ms—
2026-09-28 13:40 UTCGETpass402229 ms—
2026-09-27 16:40 UTCGETpass402147 ms—
2026-09-26 22:40 UTCGETpass402249 ms—
2026-09-26 04:40 UTCGETpass402149 ms—
2026-09-25 16:40 UTCGETpass402569 ms—
2026-09-24 22:40 UTCGETpass402186 ms—
2026-09-24 04:40 UTCGETpass402440 ms—
2026-09-23 13:40 UTCGETpass402215 ms—
2026-09-22 16:40 UTCGETpass402321 ms—
2026-09-21 22:40 UTCGETpass402338 ms—
2026-09-21 04:40 UTCGETpass402154 ms—
2026-09-20 13:40 UTCGETpass402178 ms—
2026-09-19 16:40 UTCGETpass402299 ms—
2026-09-18 22:40 UTCGETpass402175 ms—
2026-09-18 13:40 UTCGETpass402295 ms—
2026-09-17 16:40 UTCGETpass402188 ms—
2026-09-16 22:40 UTCGETpass402230 ms—
2026-09-16 13:40 UTCGETpass402807 ms—
2026-09-15 13:40 UTCGETpass402164 ms—
2026-09-14 16:40 UTCGETpass402127 ms—
2026-09-14 04:40 UTCGETpass402156 ms—
2026-09-13 13:40 UTCGETpass4021841 ms—

3.L1 — real purchases

0 of 3 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 0 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.

3 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (0 settled and answered 4xx, 3 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).

Terms in this table

settle_failed
vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
unsettled_4xx
held_reason in the export: the paid request got a 4xx with no settlement receipt and no transaction.
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
0/3
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled on-chain, crossed = signed, and not settled on-chain.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPOn-chain txLatency
09-10 01:00settle_failed404—732 ms
10000 units (≈ $0.01 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: no charge
09-08 19:00settle_failed404—671 ms
10000 units (≈ $0.01 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: no charge
09-03 01:00settle_failed404—702 ms
10000 units (≈ $0.01 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: not sorted: no charge

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

No listing changes observed.

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.

20–2,000 characters · 0 so far