Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: passLast probed: 2026-10-06 · 1 day ago

x402.charliemorrison.dev/extract

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://x402.charliemorrison.dev/extract
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodGET
Networkeip155:8453
Receiving address0x435afac555fe115f18e657e49960063c12c6aed0
Declared price (base units)2000
Catalog statusactive
First seen / last seen2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-10-07 01:02 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)5 / 4

2.Probe history

2026-09-142026-10-06
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 30 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-10-06 22:40 UTCGETpass402523 ms—
2026-10-06 04:41 UTCGETpass402228 ms—
2026-10-04 16:40 UTCGETpass402443 ms—
2026-10-03 22:40 UTCGETpass4022393 ms—
2026-10-03 04:40 UTCGETpass402370 ms—
2026-10-02 04:40 UTCGETpass4021023 ms—
2026-10-01 13:40 UTCGETpass402322 ms—
2026-09-30 16:40 UTCGETpass402275 ms—
2026-09-29 22:40 UTCGETpass402501 ms—
2026-09-29 04:40 UTCGETpass4021237 ms—
2026-09-28 13:40 UTCGETpass402645 ms—
2026-09-27 16:40 UTCGETpass402391 ms—
2026-09-26 22:40 UTCGETpass402450 ms—
2026-09-26 04:40 UTCGETpass402660 ms—
2026-09-25 13:40 UTCGETpass402607 ms—
2026-09-24 16:40 UTCGETpass402366 ms—
2026-09-23 22:40 UTCGETpass402580 ms—
2026-09-23 04:40 UTCGETpass402497 ms—
2026-09-22 13:40 UTCGETpass402314 ms—
2026-09-21 16:40 UTCGETpass402299 ms—
2026-09-20 22:40 UTCGETpass402240 ms—
2026-09-20 13:40 UTCGETpass402361 ms—
2026-09-19 16:40 UTCGETpass402483 ms—
2026-09-18 22:40 UTCGETpass402258 ms—
2026-09-18 04:40 UTCGETpass4022300 ms—
2026-09-17 13:40 UTCGETpass402417 ms—
2026-09-16 22:40 UTCGETpass402402 ms—
2026-09-15 22:40 UTCGETpass4022346 ms—
2026-09-15 13:40 UTCGETpass402784 ms—
2026-09-14 16:40 UTCGETpass402381 ms—

3.L1 — real purchases

0 of 3 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 0 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.

3 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (0 settled and answered 4xx, 3 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 0 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).

3 of the paid attempts failed on vet402's side (for example our wallet was out of USDC, or we did not send the input the listing declares). The rows stay in the table.

Terms in this table

settle_failed
vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
unsettled_4xx
held_reason in the export: the paid request got a 4xx with no settlement receipt and no transaction.
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
0/3
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled on-chain, crossed = signed, and not settled on-chain.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPOn-chain txLatency
09-17 15:27settle_failed400—930 ms
2000 units (≈ $0.002 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: vet402's side
09-10 01:02settle_failed400—877 ms
2000 units (≈ $0.002 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: vet402's side
09-02 19:00settle_failed400—698 ms
2000 units (≈ $0.002 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: vet402's side

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

No listing changes observed.

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.

20–2,000 characters · 0 so far