Skip to main content
Independent MeasurementEndpoint record (L0 · L1)Published state: passLast probed: 2026-11-13 · 1 day ago

blockrun.ai/api/v1/pm/polymarket/markets

1.Catalog declaration

Catalog declaration for this endpoint
Resource URLhttps://blockrun.ai/api/v1/pm/polymarket/markets
Sourcecdp_bazaar
Declared methodGET
Catalog networkeip155:8453
Receiving address0x6e007731870ede419cfb31889cd5c4493cecb04c
Declared price (base units)8500
Catalog statusactive
First seen / last seen2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-11-14 06:05 UTC
Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d)389 / 78

2.Probe history

2026-10-012026-11-13
Figure 1. Probe timeline, last 30 probes for this endpoint (UTC). Filled = pass, crossed = fail, dashed = unverified. Same-day probes overlap. Marks closer than one mark width are stepped down one lane.
L0 probe history, newest first
Probed atMethodVerdictHTTPLatencyReason
2026-11-13 16:40 UTCGETpass402247 ms—
2026-11-11 04:40 UTCGETpass402100 ms—
2026-11-09 04:40 UTCGETpass402134 ms—
2026-11-06 22:40 UTCGETpass402132 ms—
2026-11-04 16:40 UTCGETpass40283 ms—
2026-11-01 16:40 UTCGETpass402348 ms—
2026-10-30 16:40 UTCGETpass402115 ms—
2026-10-28 16:40 UTCGETpass402279 ms—
2026-10-27 00:40 UTCGETpass402152 ms—
2026-10-25 06:40 UTCGETpass402172 ms—
2026-10-23 04:40 UTCGETpass402174 ms—
2026-10-21 16:40 UTCGETpass402208 ms—
2026-10-20 04:40 UTCGETpass402136 ms—
2026-10-18 16:40 UTCGETpass4022152 ms—
2026-10-17 13:40 UTCGETpass4022230 ms—
2026-10-15 21:40 UTCGETpass402231 ms—
2026-10-14 15:40 UTCGETpass402273 ms—
2026-10-13 03:40 UTCGETpass4022482 ms—
2026-10-12 03:40 UTCGETpass402250 ms—
2026-10-11 03:40 UTCGETpass402127 ms—
2026-10-09 21:40 UTCGETpass402191 ms—
2026-10-08 16:40 UTCGETpass40272 ms—
2026-10-07 16:40 UTCGETpass402347 ms—
2026-10-06 16:40 UTCGETpass402628 ms—
2026-10-05 22:40 UTCGETpass402228 ms—
2026-10-04 13:40 UTCGETpass402163 ms—
2026-10-03 16:40 UTCGETpass402181 ms—
2026-10-02 22:40 UTCGETpass402164 ms—
2026-10-02 04:40 UTCGETpass402233 ms—
2026-10-01 04:40 UTCGETpass402194 ms—

3.L1 — real purchases

4 of 5 paid attempts settled on-chain, and 4 of those also returned a deliverable 2xx response (delivered: other than 202 Accepted with a non-empty body). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash, and that transaction is the evidence. On this page a receipt means the seller's own settlement receipt (PAYMENT-RESPONSE); a settled row can have none (see “tx from our index”). A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read matched the one-time value stored for that purchase, so the transaction is the one for this purchase. Stellar is not in this count. The Stellar re-read checks payer, payee, amount and asset. A row reads as amount + payee when the re-read matched payer, payee, amount and asset and did not bind a one-time value. That tier holds rows from before 2026-09-04 and Stellar rows. They keep the settled label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer vet402 confirmed on-chain. delivered is a 2xx other than 202 with a non-empty body. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered. definitions.

1 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (0 settled and answered 4xx, 0 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 1 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).

1 of the paid attempts failed on vet402's side (for example our wallet was out of USDC, or we did not send the input the listing declares). The rows stay in the table; the embeddable badge below leaves them out of its count and names them as “vet402 side”.

Terms in this table

settled (nonce-bound)
vet402 re-read the transfer on-chain in that chain's pinned settlement asset, and the on-chain re-read matched the one-time value stored for that purchase, so the transaction is the one for this purchase. Stellar is not in this count.
settle_failed
vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
settled (amount + payee)
vet402 re-read the transfer on-chain in that chain's pinned settlement asset: the on-chain re-read matched payer, payee, amount and asset and did not bind a one-time value (rows before 2026-09-04, and Stellar).
payer_unfunded
held_reason in the export: a 402 or 5xx while vet402's Base wallet was out of USDC (2026-09-13 to 2026-09-15).
L2 match (no required keys)
the declaration vet402 used marks no key as required, so vet402 checked that the response parsed as a JSON object or array, not which keys it carries.
L2 not_checked
not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
Stage delivered
vet402 re-read the payment on the chain and the paid request returned HTTP 2xx other than 202 Accepted with a body vet402 did not record as empty.
Stage inconclusive
vet402 holds the row because the paid HTTP response was 4xx, or vet402's payer wallet was unfunded in a recorded window. vet402 keeps the row public in its own stage, apart from delivered and not_delivered.
Whose side
the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “attribution under review”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
4/5
Figure 2. Settle-through: one cell per paid attempt. Filled = settled on-chain, crossed = signed, and not settled on-chain.
L1 purchase history, newest first
Attempted atResultHTTPOn-chain txPayment chainLatency
10-22 09:31settled (nonce-bound)2000xdbf52d78…76caBase1341 ms
8500 units (≈ $0.0085 USDC) · L2 match (no required keys)Whose side: no failure (delivered)Stage: delivered
09-22 06:01settled (nonce-bound)2000x5d43dc0e…4f64Base1889 ms
8500 units (≈ $0.0085 USDC) · L2 not_checked (recorded mismatch)Whose side: no failure (delivered)Stage: delivered
09-15 18:00settle_failed402—Base426 ms
8500 units (≈ $0.0085 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: vet402's sideStage: inconclusive
09-09 12:08settled (nonce-bound)2000xe96f78b0…4fc7Base1612 ms
8500 units (≈ $0.0085 USDC) · L2 not_checked (recorded mismatch)Whose side: no failure (delivered)Stage: delivered
09-03 07:00settled (amount + payee)2000xa83984fc…de91Base1573 ms
8500 units (≈ $0.0085 USDC) · L2 not_checked (recorded mismatch)Whose side: no failure (delivered)Stage: delivered

Embed this record

Run this endpoint? Show the settle-through record vet402 measured — the badge reads 4/4 settled · 4 delivered · vet402 side 1 and updates as the record grows. It carries the host it is about and the date it was last measured, so a saved copy cannot pass itself off as current. It states a measurement, not a rating.

vet402: 4 of 4 paid attempts settled with an on-chain receipt, and 4 of those also returned a deliverable HTTP 2xx response. settled is the confirmed transfer; delivered is a 2xx other than 202 with a non-empty body. 1 further paid attempt failed on vet402's side (for example its wallet was out of USDC, or it did not send the input the listing declares) and is left out of these counts. A measurement of what happened when vet402 paid this endpoint, not a recommendation. (blockrun.ai · measured 2026-10-22)

[![vet402 receipt](https://vet402.com/api/badge/endpoint/f23c2001-08b7-4785-9b7d-db5b536eda72.svg)](https://vet402.com/observatory/e/f23c2001-08b7-4785-9b7d-db5b536eda72)

Get one email when this record's verdict changes. No digest, no marketing — one message per change, and only for this endpoint. We first send one confirmation email; nothing else goes out until you confirm.

4.Catalog listing events

No listing changes observed.

unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.

5.Dispute this record

A dispute does not start a purchase. The signed dispute route runs one fresh L0 check, an unpaid request.

Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight. If it was right, it stands. A dispute filed on the record form puts an active listing on a priority list. L0 runs probe that list before their ordinary queue, one run at a time. A listing whose URL has an unfilled path parameter is not put on that list. One run measures up to 50 priority listings, at most 5 from one site. Published fails whose catalog declaration changed, or that rest on probes recorded under earlier rules, take places first, and disputes fill the places left. A listing probed in the past 60 minutes waits for a later run. A dispute that no run reaches within 7 days leaves the list. The scheduled L0 run is at 10:30 UTC, and an L0 run at another time can measure the listing first. The record stays on this page. When a run measures the listing, the new probe is added to its history. Send the dispute to support@vet402.com. Published corrections are listed at /corrections. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference). That route runs one fresh L0 check under the normal publication gate. A later purchase comes from the regular schedule.

20–2,000 characters · 0 so far