holidays.use.x402atlas.com/list
1.Catalog declaration
| Resource URL | https://holidays.use.x402atlas.com/list |
| Source | cdp_bazaar |
| Declared method | GET |
| Network | eip155:8453 |
| Receiving address | 0x8c128f1ee62bb5e47867cfbae2ad89be325df1b2 |
| Declared price (base units) | 5000 |
| Catalog status | active |
| First seen / last seen | 2026-08-14 08:39 UTC / 2026-09-29 01:02 UTC |
| Catalog-reported calls / payers (30d) | 2 / 1 |
2.Probe history
| Probed at | Method | Verdict | HTTP | Latency | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-28 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 25 ms | — |
| 2026-09-28 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 226 ms | — |
| 2026-09-27 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 453 ms | — |
| 2026-09-26 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 311 ms | — |
| 2026-09-25 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 68 ms | — |
| 2026-09-25 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 118 ms | — |
| 2026-09-24 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 111 ms | — |
| 2026-09-23 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 40 ms | — |
| 2026-09-22 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 22 ms | — |
| 2026-09-22 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 153 ms | — |
| 2026-09-21 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 288 ms | — |
| 2026-09-20 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 2076 ms | — |
| 2026-09-20 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 87 ms | — |
| 2026-09-19 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 679 ms | — |
| 2026-09-18 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 19 ms | — |
| 2026-09-17 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 208 ms | — |
| 2026-09-17 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 152 ms | — |
| 2026-09-16 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 502 ms | — |
| 2026-09-15 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 30 ms | — |
| 2026-09-15 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 222 ms | — |
| 2026-09-14 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 336 ms | — |
| 2026-09-13 22:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 296 ms | — |
| 2026-09-13 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 133 ms | — |
| 2026-09-12 16:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 22 ms | — |
| 2026-09-12 04:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 83 ms | — |
| 2026-09-11 13:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 179 ms | — |
| 2026-09-10 23:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 58 ms | — |
| 2026-09-10 14:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 82 ms | — |
| 2026-09-09 17:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 20 ms | — |
| 2026-09-09 05:40 UTC | GET | pass | 402 | 110 ms | — |
3.L1 — real purchases
3 of 4 paid attempts settled with a receipt, and 3 of those also returned a 2xx response (delivered). Each settled row carries its on-chain transaction hash — the receipt is the evidence. A settled row reads as nonce-bound when the on-chain re-read also matched the one-time signature nonce we generated for that purchase, and amount + payee when it matched amount, payee, asset and chain with no nonce on record — the binding shipped on 2026-09-04, so earlier rows carry the weaker evidence and keep their label rather than being demoted (methodology). settled is the transfer we confirmed on-chain; delivered is the response arriving. A settled row whose paid request answered 5xx counts as settled and not as delivered — definitions.
1 of those paid attempts are held as inconclusive rather than counted against this seller (0 settled and answered 4xx, 0 answered 4xx with no settlement receipt, 1 answered 402 or 5xx while our own payer wallet was out of USDC, 2026-09-13 00:00 to 2026-09-15 23:49 UTC). A 4xx says the request was not one the server would accept, and we cannot rule out that the request was ours to get wrong: vet402 buys with no API key of the seller's, and sends a POST body only when the seller declares one. This is the same principle the methodology already applied to path_template URLs, applied to the body and the authentication header as well. The rows are not deleted and not hidden — they are below, with their status and HTTP code, and they are out of the denominator for delivered (corrections).
1 of the paid attempts failed on vet402's side (for example our wallet was out of USDC, or we did not send the input the listing declares). The rows stay in the table; the embeddable badge below leaves them out of its count and names them as “vet402 side”.
Terms in this table
settle_failed- vet402 signed a payment and got no settlement receipt back.
settled (amount + payee)- vet402 confirmed the USDC transfer on-chain; the on-chain re-read matched amount, payee, asset and chain; no nonce was on record (rows before 2026-09-04).
payer_unfunded- held_reason in the export: a 402 or 5xx while vet402's Base wallet was out of USDC (2026-09-13 to 2026-09-15).
L2 not_checked- not checked: the paid request did not answer 200, so there was no response to check against the listing's output schema.
L2 match- the response had the fields the listing's output schema declares.
Whose side- the same words as the seller page: seller's side only after failures on two different days (UTC), marked “under re-check”; vet402's side; or not sorted (the rules).
| Attempted at | Result | HTTP | Receipt (tx) | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09-14 12:082026-09-14 12:08 UTC | settle_failed | 402 | — | 183 ms |
| 5000 units (≈ $0.005 USDC) · L2 not_checkedWhose side: vet402's side | ||||
| 08-29 12:082026-08-29 12:08 UTC | settled (amount + payee) | 200 | 0x2d169389…8837 | 1199 ms |
| 5000 units (≈ $0.005 USDC) · L2 matchWhose side: no failure (delivered) | ||||
| 08-21 12:212026-08-21 12:21 UTC | settled (amount + payee) | 200 | 0x0964e7c2…1f16 | 1453 ms |
| 5000 units (≈ $0.005 USDC) · L2 matchWhose side: no failure (delivered) | ||||
| 08-14 10:052026-08-14 10:05 UTC | settled (amount + payee) | 200 | 0x08e548b8…8c6e | 1168 ms |
| 5000 units (≈ $0.005 USDC) · L2 matchWhose side: no failure (delivered) | ||||
Embed this record
Run this endpoint? Show the settle-through record vet402 measured — the badge reads 3/3 settled · 3 delivered · vet402 side 1 and updates as the record grows. It carries the host it is about and the date it was last measured, so a saved copy cannot pass itself off as current. It states a measurement, not a rating.
[](https://vet402.com/observatory/e/fe6196d9-52d3-4afc-a38d-7148d2f8a963)4.Catalog listing events
No listing changes observed.
unverified is not a failure; a fail is published only after two consecutive failing probes. Definitions: methodology.
5.Dispute this record
Think a measurement above is wrong? Say which probe or purchase and what you observed instead. One person reads it and replies. The record is never deleted on dispute: if it was wrong, the correction is published with the same weight; if it was right, it stands. Operators who control the receiving address can also sign a dispute via POST /api/v1/observatory/disputes (API reference), which re-measures through the normal publication gate.
About the purchase at 2026-08-21T12:21:27Z (UTC). The form starts with that time; add what you saw instead.